Synthetic speech detection through short-term and long-term prediction traces
Open accessAbstract
Several methods for synthetic audio speech generation have been developed in the literature through the years. With the great technological advances brought by deep learning, many novel synthetic speech techniques achieving incredible realistic results have been recently proposed. As these methods generate convincing fake human voices, they can be used in a malicious way to negatively impact on today’s society (e.g., people impersonation, fake news spreading, opinion formation). For this reason, the ability of detecting whether a speech recording is synthetic or pristine is becoming an urgent necessity. In this work, we develop a synthetic speech detector. This takes as input an audio recording, extracts a series of hand-crafted features motivated by the speech-processing literature, and classify them in either closed-set or open-set. The proposed detector is validated on a publicly available dataset consisting of 17 synthetic speech generation algorithms ranging from old fashioned vocoders to modern deep learning solutions. Results show that the proposed method outperforms recently proposed detectors in the forensics literature.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Borrelli et al. (2021)'s results are more accurate than other solutions.
“The findings indicate that their results are more accurate than other solutions.”
From Deepfake detection using deep learning methods: A systematic and comprehensive review (2024) · cites this paper as Borrelli et al. (2021)
Borrelli et al. (2021)'s approach can detect in the open-set scenario whether a phony voice was made using a previously unseen methodology.
“In the open-set scenario, the suggested technique can also detect whether a phony voice was made using a previously unseen methodology.”
From Deepfake detection using deep learning methods: A systematic and comprehensive review (2024) · cites this paper as Borrelli et al. (2021)
In certain situations, combining all of Borrelli et al. (2021)'s qualities is advantageous.
“In certain situations, combining all of the qualities is advantageous.”
From Deepfake detection using deep learning methods: A systematic and comprehensive review (2024) · cites this paper as Borrelli et al. (2021)
Borrelli et al. (2021)'s approach determines whether a voice is genuine or synthetic in the closed-set setting and identifies which algorithm produced synthetic speech.
“The suggested approach determines whether the voice is genuine or synthetic in the closed-set situation. It also recognizes which algorithm was utilized to produce the voice in the case of synthetic speech.”
From Deepfake detection using deep learning methods: A systematic and comprehensive review (2024) · cites this paper as Borrelli et al. (2021)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 80
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- B. Dolhansky, J. Bitton, B. Pflaum, R. Lu, R. Howes, M. Wang, C. C. Ferrer, The deepfake detection challenge dataset. CoRR 2006.07397 (2020)
- L. Verdoliva, Media forensics and deepfakes: an overview. CoRR 2001.06564 (2020)
- Y. Li, M. Chang, S. Lyu, in IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS). In ictu oculi: exposing AI created fake videos by detecting eye blinking (IEEE, Hong Kong, 2018)
- D. Güera, E. J. Delp, in IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance (AVSS). Deepfake video detection using recurrent neural networks (IEEE, Auckland, 2018)
- F. Matern, C. Riess, M. Stamminger, in IEEE Winter Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW). Exploiting visual artifacts to expose deepfakes and face manipulations (IEEE, Waikoloa, 2019)
- N. Bonettini, E. D. Cannas, S. Mandelli, L. Bondi, P. Bestagini, S. Tubaro, in International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR). Video face manipulation detection through ensemble of CNNs (Springer, Milan, 2020)
- A. Lieto, D. Moro, F. Devoti, C. Parera, V. Lipari, P. Bestagini, S. Tubaro, in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). Hello? Who am i talking to? A shallow CNN approach for human vs. bot speech classification (IEEE, Brighton, 2019), pp. 2577-2581
- E. A. AlBadawy, S. Lyu, H. Farid, in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW). Detecting AI-synthesized speech using bispectral analysis (Computer Vision Foundation/IEEE, Long Beach, 2019), pp. 104-109
- M. Schröder, M. Charfuelan, S. Pammi, I. Steiner, in Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH). Open source voice creation toolkit for the MARY TTS platform (ISCA, Florence, 2011)
- M. Morise, F. Yokomori, K. Ozawa, WORLD: a vocoder-based high-quality speech synthesis system for real-time applications. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 99, 1877-1884 (2016)
- C. Zhang, C. Yu, J. H. Hansen, An investigation of deep-learning frameworks for speaker verification antispoofing. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Sig. Process. 11, 684-694 (2017)
- A. Janicki, in Sixteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Spoofing countermeasure based on analysis of linear prediction error (ISCA, Dresden, 2015)
- A. J. Hunt, A. W. Black, in 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings. Unit selection in a concatenative speech synthesis system using a large speech database (IEEE, Atlanta, 1996)
- A. Black, N. Campbell, in EUROSPEECH. Optimising selection of units from speech databases for concatenative synthesis (ISCA, Madrid, 1995)
- T. Masuko, K. Tokuda, T. Kobayashi, S. Imai, in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). Speech synthesis using HMMs with dynamic features (IEEE, Atlanta, 1996)
- K. Tokuda, H. Zen, A. W. Black, in IEEE Speech Synthesis Workshop. An HMM-based speech synthesis system applied to English (IEEE, Santa Monica, 2002)
- M. K. Reddy, K. S. Rao, Robust pitch extraction method for the HMM-based speech synthesis system. IEEE Sig. Process. Lett. 24, 1133-1137 (2017)
- Y. Agiomyrgiannakis, in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). Vocaine the vocoder and applications in speech synthesis (IEEE, Brisbane, 2015)
- J. Shen, R. Pang, R. J. Weiss, M. Schuster, N. Jaitly, Z. Yang, Z. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, R. Skerrv-Ryan, R. A. Saurous, Y. Agiomvrgiannakis, Y. Wu, in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). Natural TTS synthesis by conditioning wavenet on mel spectrogram predictions (IEEE, Calgary, 2018)
- N. Kalchbrenner, E. Elsen, K. Simonyan, S. Noury, N. Casagrande, E. Lockhart, F. Stimberg, A. van den Oord, S. Dieleman, K. Kavukcuoglu, Efficient neural audio synthesis. CoRR 1802.08435 (2018)
- M. R. Kamble, H. B. Sailor, H. A. Patil, H. Li, Advances in anti-spoofing: from the perspective of ASVspoof challenges. APSIPA Trans. Sig. Inf. Process. 9, 18 (2020). https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/apsipa- transactions-on-signal-and-information-processing/article/advances-in- antispoofing-from-the-perspective-of-asvspoof-challenges/ 6B5BB5B75A49022EB869C7117D5E4A9C
- X. Xiao, X. Tian, S. Du, H. Xu, E. S. Chng, H. Li, in Sixteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Spoofing speech detection using high dimensional magnitude and phase features: the NTU approach for ASVspoof 2015 challenge (ISCA, Dresden, 2015)
- H. Dinkel, N. Chen, Y. Qian, K. Yu, in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). End-to-end spoofing detection with raw waveform CLDNNS (IEEE, New Orleans, 2017)
- Linear prediction in narrowband and wideband coding (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Hoboken, 2005), pp. 91-112. Chap. 4
- VCTK corpus. http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/ds/1994. Accessed 23 Mar 2021 · DOI
- X. Wang, J. Lorenzo-Trueba, S. Takaki, L. Juvela, J. Yamagishi, in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). A comparison of recent waveform generation and acoustic modeling methods for neural-network-based speech synthesis (IEEE, Calgary, 2018)
- Z. Wu, O. Watts, S. King, in Speech Synthesis Workshop (SSW). Merlin: an open source neural network speech synthesis system (Sunnyvale, ISCA, 2016)
- C. Hsu, H. Hwang, Y. Wu, Y. Tsao, H. Wang, in Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA). Voice conversion from non-parallel corpora using variational auto-encoder (IEEE, Jeju, 2016)
- D. Matrouf, J. Bonastre, C. Fredouille, in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). Effect of speech transformation on impostor acceptance (IEEE, Toulouse, 2006)
- K. Tanaka, H. Kameoka, T. Kaneko, N. Hojo, WaveCycleGAN2: time-domain neural post-filter for speech waveform generation. CoRR 1904.02892 (2019)
- X. Wang, S. Takaki, J. Yamagishi, in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). Neural source-filter-based waveform model for statistical parametric speech synthesis (IEEE, Brighton, 2019)
- H. Zen, Y. Agiomyrgiannakis, N. Egberts, F. Henderson, P. Szczepaniak, in Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH). Fast, compact, and high quality LSTM-RNN based statistical parametric speech synthesizers for mobile devices (ISCA, San Francisco, 2016)
- Y. Jia, Y. Zhang, R. Weiss, Q. Wang, J. Shen, F. Ren, z. Chen, P. Nguyen, R. Pang, I. Lopez Moreno, Y. Wu, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS). Transfer learning from speaker verification to multispeaker text-to-speech synthesis (Curran Associates, Inc., Montreal, 2018)
- D. Griffin, J. Lim, Signal estimation from modified short-time Fourier transform. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Sig. Process. (TASLP). 32, 236-243 (1984)
- T. Kinnunen, J. Lorenzo-Trueba, J. Yamagishi, T. Toda, D. Saito, F. Villavicencio, Z. Ling, in The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop. A spoofing benchmark for the 2018 voice conversion challenge: leveraging from spoofing countermeasures for speech artifact assessment (ISCA, Les Sables d'Olonne, 2018)
- F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, E. Duchesnay, Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. (JMLR). 12, 2825-2830 (2011)
- Authors
- Borrelli, C., Bestagini, P., Antonacci, F., Sarti, A., & Tubaro, S.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Milano (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Borrelli, Clara
- Venue
- EURASIP Journal on Information Security
- Published
- 2021-04-06
- Volume
- 2021
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1687-4161 (ISSN-L)
- 2510-523X
- OpenAlex
- W3157576687
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- EURASIP Journal on Information Security (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Nvidia
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- synthetic speech detection, speech forensics, deepfake detection, speech synthesis, handcrafted features, open-set detection, impersonation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review