The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition that it is good practice to involve stakeholders (meaning patients, the public, health professionals and others) in systematic reviews, but limited evidence about how best to do this. We aimed to document the evidence-base relating to stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews and to use this evidence to describe how stakeholders have been involved in systematic reviews. METHODS: We carried out a scoping review, following a published protocol. We searched multiple electronic databases (2010-2016), using a stepwise searching approach, supplemented with hand searching. Two authors independently screened and discussed the first 500 abstracts and, after clarifying selection criteria, screened a further 500. Agreement on screening decisions was 97%, so screening was done by one reviewer only. Pre-planned data extraction was completed, and the comprehensiveness of the description of methods of involvement judged. Additional data extraction was completed for papers judged to have most comprehensive descriptions. Three stakeholder representatives were co-authors for this systematic review. RESULTS: We included 291 papers in which stakeholders were involved in a systematic review. Thirty percent involved patients and/or carers. Thirty-two percent were from the USA, 26% from the UK and 10% from Canada. Ten percent (32 reviews) were judged to provide a comprehensive description of methods of involving stakeholders. Sixty-nine percent (22/32) personally invited people to be involved; 22% (7/32) advertised opportunities to the general population. Eighty-one percent (26/32) had between 1 and 20 face-to-face meetings, with 83% of these holding ≤ 4 meetings. Meetings lasted 1 h to ½ day. Nineteen percent (6/32) used a Delphi method, most often involving three electronic rounds. Details of ethical approval were reported by 10/32. Expenses were reported to be paid to people involved in 8/32 systematic reviews. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: We identified a relatively large number (291) of papers reporting stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews, but the quality of reporting was generally very poor. Information from a subset of papers judged to provide the best descriptions of stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews provide examples of different ways in which stakeholders have been involved in systematic reviews. These examples arguably currently provide the best available information to inform and guide decisions around the planning of stakeholder involvement within future systematic reviews. This evidence has been used to develop online learning resources. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol for this systematic review was published on 21 April 2017. Publication reference: Pollock A, Campbell P, Struthers C, Synnot A, Nunn J, Hill S, Goodare H, Watts C, Morley R: Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a protocol for a systematic review of methods, outcomes and effects. Research Involvement and Engagement 2017, 3:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-017-0060-4 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In fact, it underlines the concept of integrated knowledge translation [37, 38].”
From Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Engaging patients in the process of designing the review protocol and in reviewing the findings increase the applicability and relevance of the findings of this study.”
From Systematic review of mind‐body interventions to treat myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (2021) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616 · Cited by 36,742
Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O'Brien, K. K. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 · Cited by 15,268
Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting
Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O'Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., Kastner, M., & Moher, D. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013 · Cited by 2,783
Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Simera, I., Seers, K., Mockford, C., Goodlad, S., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Barber, R., Denegri, S., et al. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j3453 · Cited by 1,983
Patient engagement in research: a systematic review
Domecq, J. P., Prutsky, G., Elraiyah, T., Wang, Z., Nabhan, M., Shippee, N., Brito, J. P., Boehmer, K., Hasan, R., Firwana, B., et al. (2014) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-89 · Cited by 1,773
Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Simera, I., Seers, K., Mockford, C., Goodlad, S., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Barber, R., Denegri, S., et al. (2017) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-017-0062-2 · Cited by 1,643 · cited 1×
“stakeholder involvement in research has recently been updated (GRIPP2, [62]); however, this guidance has not been specifically tested for use with systematic reviews and has lacked international input during development.”
BackgroundA New Taxonomy for Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Concannon, T. W., Meißner, P., Grunbaum, J. A., McElwee, N. E., Guise, J., Santa, J. S., Conway, P. H., Daudelin, D. H., Morrato, E. H., & Leslie, L. K. (2012) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2037-1 · Cited by 532
Concannon, T. W., Fuster, M., Saunders, T. S., Patel, K., Wong, J. B., Leslie, L. K., & Lau, J. (2014) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-014-2878-x · Cited by 470
Systematic review of tools to measure outcomes for young children with autism spectrum disorder
McConachie, H., Parr, J. R., Glod, M., Hanratty, J., Livingstone, N., Oono, I. P., Robalino, S., Baird, G., Beresford, B., Charman, T., et al. (2015) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta19410 · Cited by 403
Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Mockford, C., & Barber, R. (2011) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462311000481 · Cited by 369
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Cochrane Consumer Network. Cochrane consumer network structure and function review, 2015. https://consumers.cochrane.org/ccnet-structure-and-function-review . Accessed 6 Nov 2018.
- Involving people: a learning resource for systematic review authors. http://training.cochrane.org/involving-people . Accessed 6 Nov 2018.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application
Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Colquhoun, H., Garritty, C. M., Hempel, S., Horsley, T., Langlois, E. V., Lillie, E., O’Brien, K. K., Tunçalp, Ӧ., et al. (2021) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3 · Cited by 887
Campbell, F., Tricco, A. C., Munn, Z., Pollock, D., Saran, A., Sutton, A., White, H., & Khalil, H. (2023) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-023-02178-5 · Cited by 345
Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews
Wagner, G., Lukyanenko, R., & Paré, G. (2021) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962211048201 · Cited by 364
Petkovic, J., Riddle, A. Y., Akl, E. A., Khabsa, J., Lytvyn, L., Atwere, P., Campbell, P., Chalkidou, K., Chang, S., Crowe, S., et al. (2020) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-020-1272-5 · Cited by 241
Self-citationInnovations in framework synthesis as a systematic review method
Brunton, G., Oliver, S. R., & Thomas, J. (2020) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1399 · Cited by 254
Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews
Pollock, A., Campbell, P., Struthers, C., Synnot, A., Nunn, J., Hill, S., Goodare, H., Morris, J. H., Watts, C., & Morley, R. (2019) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/1355819619841647 · Cited by 213
Self-citationPollock, D., Alexander, L., Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Khalil, H., Godfrey, C. M., McInerney, P., Synnot, A., & Tricco, A. C. (2022) · JBI Evidence Synthesis · doi:10.11124/jbies-21-00416 · Cited by 182
Self-citationThe implementation of interprofessional education: a scoping review
Bogossian, F., New, K., George, K., Barr, N., Dodd, N., Hamilton, A. L., Nash, G., Masters, N., Pelly, F., Reid, C., et al. (2023) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-022-10128-4 · Cited by 155
Noel-Storr, A. H., Dooley, G., Elliott, J., Steele, E. J., Shemilt, I., Mavergames, C., Wisniewski, S., McDonald, S. J., Murano, M., Glanville, J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.006 · Cited by 137
Ruane‐McAteer, E., Gillespie, K., Amin, A., Aventin, Á., Robinson, M., Hanratty, J., Khosla, R., & Lohan, M. (2020) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002997 · Cited by 122
Todhunter‐Brown, A., Hazelton, C., Campbell, P., Elders, A., Hagen, S., & McClurg, D. (2022) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012337.pub2 · Cited by 112
Self-citationScoping reviews in medical education: A scoping review
Maggio, L. A., Larsen, K. L., Thomas, A., Costello, J. A., & Artino, A. R. (2020) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.14431 · Cited by 121
Differentiating between mapping reviews and scoping reviews in the evidence synthesis ecosystem
Khalil, H., & Tricco, A. C. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.012 · Cited by 101
Agyei‐Manu, E., Atkins, N., Lee, B., Rostron, J., Dozier, M., Smith, M. P., & McQuillan, R. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13787 · Cited by 99
Robledo, S., Grisales Aguirre, A. M., Hughes, M., & Eggers, F. (2023) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1080/00472778.2021.1955125 · Cited by 80
Co-production from proposal to paper
Hickey, G., Richards, T., & Sheehy, J. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-018-06861-9 · Cited by 80
Valimaki, M. A., Hu, S., Lantta, T., Hipp, K., Varpula, J., Chen, J., Liu, G., Tang, Y., Chen, W., & Li, X. (2024) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-024-02096-4 · Cited by 90
McIntosh, E. J., Chapman, S., Kearney, S. G., Williams, B. A., Althor, G., Thorn, J., Pressey, R. L., McKinnon, M., & Grenyer, R. (2018) · Environmental Evidence · doi:10.1186/s13750-018-0134-2 · Cited by 74
Halliday, L. J., Doganay, E., Wynter-Blyth, V., Hanna, G. B., & Moorthy, K. (2020) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11605-020-04881-3 · Cited by 69
Halliday, L. J., Doganay, E., Wynter-Blyth, V., Osborn, H., Buckley, J., & Moorthy, K. (2020) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11605-020-04561-2 · Cited by 58
Towards Privacy-Preserved Aging in Place: A Systematic Review
Gochoo, M., Alnajjar, F., Tan, T.-H., & Khalid, S. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21093082 · Cited by 62
Knowles, S., Sharma, V., Fortune, S., Wadman, R., Churchill, R., & Hetrick, S. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13479 · Cited by 49
How does sediment exposure affect corals? A systematic review protocol
Tuttle, L. J., Johnson, C. E., Kolinski, S., Minton, D., & Donahue, M. J. (2020) · Environmental Evidence · doi:10.1186/s13750-020-00200-0 · Cited by 49
Boden, C., Edmonds, A. M., Porter, T., Bath, B. L., Dunn, K., Gerrard, A., Goodridge, D. M., & Stobart, C. (2021) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13279 · Cited by 39
Ellis, U. M., Kitchin, V., & Vis‐Dunbar, M. (2021) · Journal of Participatory Medicine · doi:10.2196/27141 · Cited by 38
Pilkington, K., Ridge, D., Igwesi-Chidobe, C. N., Chew-Graham, C. A., Little, P. S., Babatunde, O. O., McDermott, C., & Cheshire, A. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113369 · Cited by 37
Nunn, J., & Chang, S. (2020) · WikiJournal of Medicine · doi:10.15347/wjm/2020.005 · Cited by 54
Self-citationMuñoz-Martínez, J., Cussó-Parcerisas, I., & Álvarez, E. C. (2024) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2024.03.002 · Cited by 36
Single‐cell atlas of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from pregnant women
Chen, D., Wang, W., Wu, L., Liang, L., Wang, S., Cheng, Y., Zhang, T., Chai, C., Luo, Q., Sun, C., et al. (2022) · Clinical and Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/ctm2.821 · Cited by 34
Opie, J. E., Vuong, A. T., Welsh, E. T., Esler, T. B., Khan, U. R., & Khalil, H. (2024) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-024-00468-5 · Cited by 39
A taxonomy of impacts on clinical and translational research from community stakeholder engagement
Stallings, S., Boyer, A. P., Joosten, Y. A., Novak, L. L., Richmond, A., Vaughn, Y. C., & Wilkins, C. H. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12937 · Cited by 32
Qualitative Exploration of Engaging Patients as Advisors in a Program of Evidence Synthesis
Gierisch, J. M., Hughes, J. M., Williams, J. W., Gordon, A. M., & Goldstein, K. M. (2019) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001174 · Cited by 30
Khanpour Ardestani, S., Karkhaneh, M., Stein, E., Punja, S., Junqueira, D. R., Kuzmyn, T., Pearson, M., Smith, L., Olson, K., & Vohra, S. (2021) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina57070652 · Cited by 30
“Patient engagement in health research can improve the quality, relevance and impact of the research [36,37].”
BackgroundSocial and Emotional Learning in Preschool Settings: A Systematic Map of Systematic Reviews
Djamnezhad, D., Koltcheva, N., Dizdarević, A., Mujezinović, A., Peixoto, C., Coelho, V., Achten, M., Kolumbán, E., Machado, F., & Hofvander, B. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.691670 · Cited by 29
Use and value of systematic reviews in English local authority public health: a qualitative study
South, E., & Lorenc, T. (2020) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09223-1 · Cited by 29
Grant, S., Armstrong, C., & Khodyakov, D. (2021) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-020-06514-6 · Cited by 34
Isaacs, A. N., Brooks, H. L., Lawn, S., Mohammadi, L., Vicary, E., & Sutton, K. (2022) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2022.06.018 · Cited by 27
Dion, A., Gutierrez, A. C., Jimenez, V., Ameur, A. B., Robert, É., Joseph, L., & Andersson, N. (2021) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/15586898211037412 · Cited by 25
Kugler, C. M., Breuing, J., Rombey, T., Heß, S., Ambe, P. C., Grohmann, E., & Pieper, D. (2021) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-021-01684-8 · Cited by 28
The GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist extension for engagement
Petkovic, J., Magwood, O., Concannon, T. W., Akl, E. A., Khabsa, J., Lytvyn, L., Welch, V. A., Avey, M. T., Bhaumik, S., Gunn, A., et al. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111727 · Cited by 23
Self-citationBaumann, L. A., & Brütt, A. L. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043650 · Cited by 20
Warner, N. Z., & Groarke, A. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08372-w · Cited by 20
PROTOCOL: Guidance for stakeholder engagement in guideline development: A scoping review
Petkovic, J., Riddle, A. Y., Lytvyn, L., Khabsa, J., Akl, E. A., Welch, V. A., Magwood, O., Atwere, P., Graham, I. D., Grant, S., et al. (2022) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1242 · Cited by 19
Scobbie, L., Thomson, K., Pollock, A., & Evans, J. J. (2020) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2020.1774397 · Cited by 18
Self-citationMagwood, O., Riddle, A. Y., Petkovic, J., Lytvyn, L., Khabsa, J., Atwere, P., Akl, E. A., Campbell, P., Welch, V. A., Smith, M. P., et al. (2022) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1237 · Cited by 18
Self-citationNoyek, S. E., Jessa, J. S., Faulkner, V., Boerner, K. E., Dewan, T., Doyle, D., Genik, L. M., Grainger-Schatz, S., McMorris, C. A., McMurtry, C. M., et al. (2023) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003066 · Cited by 18
Kayes, N. M., Martin, R., Bright, F. A. S., Kersten, P., & Pollock, A. (2019) · European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.23736/s1973-9087.19.05793-9 · Cited by 17
Self-citationHow are patient partners involved in health service research? A scoping review of reviews
Tscherning, S. C., Jensen, A. L., Bekker, H., Vedelø, T. W., Finderup, J., Rasmussen, G. S., Østergaard, J. A., Jensen, F. O., & Rodkjær, L. Ø. (2025) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-025-00755-7 · Cited by 17
Standardised Data on Initiatives - STARDIT: Alpha VersionPreprint
Nunn, J., Shafee, T. M. A., Chang, S., Stephens, R., Elliott, J., Oliver, S. R., John, D., Smith, M., & Orr, N. (2019) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/5q47h · Cited by 18
Self-citationEvans, C., Hassanein, Z. M., Bains, M., Bennett, C. L., Bjerrum, M. B., Edgley, A., Edwards, D. J., Porritt, K. A., & Salmond, S. W. (2024) · JBI Evidence Synthesis · doi:10.11124/jbies-24-00025 · Cited by 19
Effectiveness of integrated care models for stroke patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Liu, B., Cai, J., & Zhou, L. (2024) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/jnu.13027 · Cited by 18
Merner, B., Lowe, D. B., Walsh, L., Synnot, A., Stratil, J. M., Lewin, S. A., Glenton, C., von Philipsborn, P., Schonfeld, L., Ryan, R. E., et al. (2021) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2021.306252 · Cited by 15
Self-citationHarel‐Sterling, M., Kwan, C., Pirie, J., Tessaro, M. O., Cho, D. D., Coblentz, A. C., Halabi, M., Cohen, E., Nield, L. E., Pusic, M. V., et al. (2023) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.11.002 · Cited by 16
En Route to Implementation Science 3.0
Albers, B., Shlonsky, A., & Mildon, R. L. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03874-8_1 · Cited by 18
Apedani, D. B., Koduah, A., Druye, A. A., & Enyan, N. I. E. (2021) · International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijans.2021.100366 · Cited by 18
Khabsa, J., Petkovic, J., Riddle, A. Y., Lytvyn, L., Magwood, O., Atwere, P., Campbell, P., Katikireddi, S. V., Merner, B., Nasser, M., et al. (2022) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1232 · Cited by 14
Self-citationAn Asian Body to Tackle Cancers in Asia – The Asian National Cancer Centers Alliance
Gatellier, L., Matsuda, T., Sabapathy, K., Dai, M., Dewi, L. K. M., Huong, T. T., Kardinah, K., Thuân, T. V., Park, J. B., He, J., et al. (2020) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.31557/apjcp.2020.21.5.1207 · Cited by 14
Bao, G., Liu, H., Ma, Y., Li, N., Lv, F., Dong, X., & Chen, X. (2021) · PubMed Central · Cited by 13
Morgan, T. L., Faught, E., Ross‐White, A., Fortier, M., Duggan, M., Jain, R., Lane, K. N., Lorbergs, A. L., Maclaren, K., McFadden, T., et al. (2023) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-023-02091-9 · Cited by 14
France, E. F., Uny, I., Turley, R. L., Thomson, K., Noyes, J., Jordan, A. L., Forbat, L., Caes, L., & Bianchim, M. S. (2023) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd014873.pub2 · Cited by 12
Wang, Y., Xuebo, Z., She, Y., Kang, Q., & Chen, X. (2024) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1370383 · Cited by 12
Principles of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Morgan, R. L., & Flórez, I. D. (2021) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_1 · Cited by 12
O’Cathain, A., Foster, A., Carroll, C., Preston, L., Ogden, M., Clowes, M., & Protheroe, J. (2022) · Health and Social Care Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/ivqj9044 · Cited by 13
Kuhn, T. K., Vikström, S., Suškevičs, M., Storie, J., Saikkonen, L., Rees, R. W., Håkansson, C., Oinonen, S., & Burkhard, B. (2023) · Ecosystems and People · doi:10.1080/26395916.2023.2188970 · Cited by 11
Guidance for engagement in health guideline development: A scoping review
Petkovic, J., Riddle, A. Y., Lytvyn, L., Khabsa, J., Akl, E. A., Welch, V. A., Magwood, O., Atwere, P., Graham, I. D., Grant, S., et al. (2024) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.70006 · Cited by 10
Hayes, D., & Za’ba, N. (2021) · Counselling and Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/capr.12407 · Cited by 10
A systematic review of psycho‐social interventions for individuals with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant
Warner, N. Z., Matthews, S., Groarke, A., & McSharry, J. (2021) · Journal of Genetic Counseling · doi:10.1002/jgc4.1436 · Cited by 9
Yaacoub, S. G., Khamis, A. M., Al‐Gibbawi, M., Kahale, L. A., Bathon, J. M., England, B. R., Fraenkel, L., Clair, E. W. S., Turner, A. S., & Akl, E. A. (2021) · ACR Open Rheumatology · doi:10.1002/acr2.11300 · Cited by 10
Ridge, D., Pilkington, K., Donovan, S., Moschopoulou, E., Gopal, D. P., Bhui, K. S., Chalder, T., Khan, I. U., Korszun, A., Taylor, S. J., et al. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0284878 · Cited by 11
Coumoundouros, C., von Essén, L., Sanderman, R., & Woodford, J. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035406 · Cited by 10
Exploring harm in psychotherapy: Perspectives of clinicians working with children and young people
Batic, B. C., & Hayes, D. (2020) · Counselling and Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/capr.12347 · Cited by 10
Yan, H., Rahgozar, A., Sethuram, C., Karunananthan, S., Archibald, D., Bradley, L., Hakimjavadi, R., Helmer‐Smith, M., Jolin‐Dahel, K., McCutcheon, T., et al. (2022) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/34575 · Cited by 10
Cochrane overviews: how can we optimize their impact on evidence-based rehabilitation?
Pollock, A., & van Wijck, F. (2019) · European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.23736/s1973-9087.19.05780-0 · Cited by 11
Self-citationCashin, A. G., Rizzo, R. R. N., Wand, B. M., O'Connell, N. E., Lee, H., Bagg, M. K., O’Hagan, E. T., Maher, C. G., Furlan, A. D., van Tulder, M. W., et al. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd014691 · Cited by 9
Tranexamic acid for prevention of bleeding in cesarean delivery: An overview of systematic reviews
Hurskainen, T., Deng, M. X., Etherington, C., Burns, J. K., Calderon, L. M., Moher, D., Edwards, W., & Boet, S. (2021) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aas.13981 · Cited by 9
Conte, K. P., Laycock, A. F., Bailie, J., Walke, E., Onnis, L., Feeney, L., Langham, E., Cunningham, F. C., Matthews, V., & Bailie, R. S. (2024) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-023-01087-2 · Cited by 11
Thomson, K., Todhunter‐Brown, A., Brady, M., Campbell, P., Dorris, L., Hunter, S. M., Nicolson, D. J., & Hazelton, C. (2024) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-024-00637-4 · Cited by 8
Self-citationStrategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis
Todhunter‐Brown, A., Booth, L., Campbell, P., Cheer, B., Cowie, J., Elders, A., Hagen, S., Jankulak, K., Mason, H., Millington, C., et al. (2024) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/pltr9622 · Cited by 13
Self-citationPaper 6: engaging racially and ethnically diverse interest holders in evidence syntheses
Sathe, N. A., Ovelman, C., Ospina, N. S., Dewidar, O., Terhune, E., Francis, D., Welch, V. A., Heyn, P. C., Duque, T. G., & Viswanathan, M. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111575 · Cited by 11
Arab scholarship in educational administration, management and leadership: An overview
Attari, A. T. M. A., & Essa, E. B. (2021) · Educational Management, Administration & Leadership · doi:10.1177/17411432211012011 · Cited by 7
Youth and family engagement in childhood disability evidence syntheses: A scoping review
Wang, L., Micsinszki, S. K., Goulet‐Barteaux, M., Gilman, C., & Phoenix, M. P. (2022) · Child Care Health and Development · doi:10.1111/cch.13022 · Cited by 8
Bird, K. S., Stokes, N., Tomlinson, M., & Rivas, C. A. (2023) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-023-00541-7 · Cited by 10
Brown, J., Baer, G. D., Cameron, S., Jackson, K., Lamouline, C., Morley, R., Ormsby, D., Synnot, A., & Todhunter‐Brown, A. (2023) · Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods · doi:10.1002/cesm.12032 · Cited by 8
Self-citationGhana’s Adherence to PASCAR’s 10-Point Action Plan towards Hypertension Control: A Scoping Review
Sambah, F., Malau‐Aduli, B. S., Seidu, A., Malau‐Aduli, A. E. O., & Emeto, T. I. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20021425 · Cited by 7
Kohl, G., Ulate, M. M., Bhatt, J., Lynch, J. K., Scior, K., & Charlesworth, G. M. (2024) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnae186 · Cited by 7
Rommerskirch‐Manietta, M., Manietta, C., Hoffmann, A. L., Rohra, H., Gove, D., Alpers, B., Hung, L., Geary, C. R., Abbott, K. H., Ren, L. H., et al. (2023) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-023-00461-2 · Cited by 9
Governing Urban Transport Packages in Norway: Understanding Conditions for Public Participation
Tønnesen, A., Krogstad, J. R., & Christiansen, P. (2023) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s2044-994120230000018010 · Cited by 7
Hazelton, C., Todhunter‐Brown, A., Campbell, P., Thomson, K., Nicolson, D. J., McGill, K., Chung, C. S., Dorris, L., Gillespie, D. C., Hunter, S. M., et al. (2023) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/wgjt3471 · Cited by 6
Self-citationPapadopoulou, E., Lim, Y. C., Chin, W. Y., Dwan, K. M., Munabi-Babigumira, S. K., & Lewin, S. A. (2023) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd015311 · Cited by 6
Lewis, R. A., Hughes, D. A., Sutton, A. J., & Wilkinson, C. (2020) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-020-00980-w · Cited by 8
A Meta-Review of Education Meta-Analyses: Relevance, Applicability, and Accessibility of Findings
Pellegrini, M., Day, E., Scarbrough, H. F., & Pigott, T. (2025) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/23328584251389562 · Cited by 4
Li, Q., Zhang, D., Quinn, É., Walsh, P. K., & Hynes, S. M. (2026) · International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2026.100490 · Cited by 5
Shrestha, S., Cummings, G. G., Knopp‐Sihota, J., Devkota, R., & Hoben, M. (2024) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-024-02459-7 · Cited by 4
Rommerskirch‐Manietta, M., Manietta, C., Hoffmann, A. L., Rohra, H., Fink, L., Kelleter, H., Breimaier, H. E., Möller, J., Oberfeld, S., Alpers, B., et al. (2025) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-025-00719-x · Cited by 5
Research Buddy partnership in a MD–PhD program: lessons learned
Gould, D. J., Glanville-Hearst, M., Bunzli, S., Choong, P., & Dowsey, M. M. (2023) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-023-00414-9 · Cited by 4
Reyneke, R. A., Richens, I. F., Buchanan, H., Davies, E. B., Sorrell, C., Ashmore, A., & Brennan, M. L. (2023) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105928 · Cited by 4
Knight, S. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069251318590 · Cited by 8
Munthe‐Kaas, H. M., Nøkleby, H., & Rosenbaum, S. (2022) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1284 · Cited by 3
Jull, J., Smith, M., Carley, M. E., Stacey, D., Graham, I. D., The Cochrane Decision Coaching Review Team, Boland, L., Dunn, S., Dwyer, A. A., Finderup, J., et al. (2024) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-024-02563-8 · Cited by 6
Involving adolescents in evidence syntheses: an umbrella review
Warraitch, A., Sulowska, M., Wacker, C., Lee, M., Bruce, D., Hernon, J., Khraisha, Q., & Hadfield, K. (2025) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-025-02815-1 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Pollock, A., Campbell, P., Struthers, C., Synnot, A., Nunn, J., Hill, S., Goodare, H., Morris, J., Watts, C., & Morley, R.
- Affiliations
- Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- La Trobe University (AU)
- University of Dundee (GB)
- Cochrane (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pollock, Alex
- ORCID
- Venue
- Systematic Reviews
- Published
- 2018-11-24
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 208-208
- ISSN
- 2046-4053 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6260873
- OpenAlex
- W2900615641
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Cochrane Central Executive (n/a)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Keywords
- stakeholder engagement, patient and public involvement, co-authorship, Delphi method, reporting quality, research ethics approval, healthcare workers, online learning resources, methodological transparency
- MeSH terms
- Stakeholder Participation, Systematic Reviews as Topic, Humans, Patients, Research Design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
