The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stochastic Gradient Descent long short-term memory based secure encryption algorithm for cloud data storage and retrieval in cloud computing environment
Open accessAbstract
With the increasing rise of distributed system technologies, one of the most pressing problems facing the digital world is ensuring the security of sensitive and confidential data during transport and storage, which is also regarded as one of the most critical difficulties facing cloud computing. Numerous techniques exist for enhancing data security in the cloud computing storage environment. Encryption is the most important method of data protection. Consequently, several accessible encryption strategies are utilized to provide security, integrity, and authorized access by employing modern cryptographic algorithms. Cloud computing is an innovative paradigm widely accepted as a platform for storing and analysing user data. The cloud is accessible via the internet, exposing the data to external and internal threats. Cloud Service Providers (CSPs) must now implement a secure architecture to detect cloud intrusions and safeguard client data from hackers and attackers. This paper combines Stochastic Gradient Descent long short-term memory (SGD-LSTM) and Blow Fish encryption to detect and prevent unauthorized cloud access. User registration, intrusion detection, and intrusion prevention are the three phases of the planned system. The SGD-LSTM classifier predicts cloud data access and prevents unauthorized cloud access. In the data access phase, cloud data access is managed by authenticating the authorized user with the Blowfish encryption algorithm. Comparing the proposed classifier to existing classifiers demonstrates that it detects abnormal access accurately. The experimental outcomes enhanced data security, which can be utilized to protect cloud computing applications. The experimental results of the suggested SGD-LSTM algorithm indicated a high level of protection, as well as a considerable improvement in security and execution speed when compared to algorithms that are often used in cloud computing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, refs.[20,48,49] explore innovative techniques for scaling threat detection in decentralized architectures, reflecting a shift toward real-world deployment in complex infrastructures.”
From Application of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Enhanced Insider Threat Detection in Cybersecurity: Bibliometric Review (2025) · cites this paper as [48]
Citations
Cites
Sajid, A., Abbas, H., & Saleem, K. (2016) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2016.2549047 · Cited by 401
Machine Learning-Based Models for Early Stage Detection of Autism Spectrum Disorders
Akter, T., Satu, M. S., Khan, M. I., Ali, M. H., Uddin, S., Lió, P., Quinn, J. M. W., & Moni, M. A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2952609 · Cited by 245
Towards DNA based data security in the cloud computing environment
Namasudra, S., Devi, D., Kadry, S., Sundarasekar, R., & Shanthini, A. (2020) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2019.12.041 · Cited by 168
CryptoGA: a cryptosystem based on genetic algorithm for cloud data security
Tahir, M., Sardaraz, M., Mehmood, Z., & Muhammad, S. (2020) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-020-03157-4 · Cited by 147
Hatami‐Marbini, A., & Kangi, F. (2016) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.09.021 · Cited by 143
Saravanan, G., Neelakandan, S., Ezhumalai, P., & Maurya, S. (2023) · Journal of Cloud Computing Advances Systems and Applications · doi:10.1186/s13677-023-00401-1 · Cited by 116
Deep Incremental Hashing Network for Efficient Image Retrieval
Wu, D., Dai, Q., Liu, J., Li, B., & Wang, W. (2019) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00928 · Cited by 112
DNA Cryptography and Deep Learning using Genetic Algorithm with NW algorithm for Key Generation
Kalsi, S., Kaur, H., & Chang, V. I. C. (2017) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-017-0851-z · Cited by 108
BDNA-A DNA inspired symmetric key cryptographic technique to secure cloud computing
Sohal, M. K., & Sharma, S. (2018) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.09.024 · Cited by 105
Paulraj, D., Sethukarasi, T., Neelakandan, S., Prakash, M., & Baburaj, E. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0282600 · Cited by 82
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Thabit, Fursan and Alhomdy, Sharaf Abdul-Haq and Alahdal, Abdulrazzaq and Jagtap, Sudhir B (2020) Exploration of Security Challenges in Cloud Computing: Issues, Threats, and Attacks with their Alleviating Techniques (December 02, 2020). J Chem Inf Comput, 12(10). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3749271
- Cimi Thomas M, Sheeja S (2017) Secure symmetric encryption scheme using genetic algorithm. Int J Appl Eng Res 12(21):10828–10833
- Narendren S, Yathish YB, C.M. B (2018) A cryptosystem using two layers of security - DNA and RSA cryptography. J Pure Appl Math 119(7):217–224
Cited by
Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Cryptography Techniques in Cloud Computing
Sasikumar, K., & Nagarajan, S. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3385449 · Cited by 75
Pichandi, K. V., Janarthanan, V., Annamalai, T., & Arumugam, M. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124479 · Cited by 29
Securing the Digital Supply Chain Cyber Threats and Vulnerabilities
Sindiramutty, S. R., Jhanjhi, N. Z., Tan, C. E., Khan, N. A., Shah, B., & Gaur, L. (2023) · Advances in logistics, operations, and management science book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-7625-3.ch007 · Cited by 22
Rafi, S. M., Yogesh, R., & Sriram, M. (2024) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2024.104183 · Cited by 12
A hybrid deep learning approach for enhanced network intrusion detection
Prabu, K., & Sudhakar, P. (2024) · Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science · doi:10.11591/ijeecs.v33.i3.pp1915-1923 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Suganya, M., & Sasipraba, T.
- Affiliations
- Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Suganya, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Cloud Computing
- Published
- 2023-05-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2192-113X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4381568774
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 8.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Cloud Computing Advances Systems and Applications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
- Keywords
- cloud data security, cloud storage encryption, cloud data retrieval, intrusion detection, intrusion prevention, unauthorized access detection, Blowfish encryption, user authentication, cloud service providers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
