Health status and health behaviour of the Hungarian homeless people
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Homelessness has risen recently in Europe, but there is lack of comprehensive health data on this population. Our aim was to characterize the health of the Hungarian homeless population. Methods: We performed a health survey with 453 homeless individuals. The results were compared to the age and sex standardized data of the general Hungarian population and its lowest income quintile from the European Health Interview Survey 2014. The differences by the ETHOS classification within the homeless population were also studied. Results: Significantly fewer homeless people reported good health status than in the general population or in its lowest income quintile ( p < 0.001). Of the participants 70% had at least one chronic disease, only 41% of them visited a GP and 35% took medication in the previous 12 months. While 59% of the lowest income quintile and 50% of the general population had at least one chronic disease, almost all of them visited a physician and took medication. The highest prevalence of morbidity (80%) and multimorbidity (46%) was reported in the houseless group. The majority of the homeless people were current smokers, the prevalence was much higher than in the two reference populations ( p < 0.001). The prevalence of heavy drinkers was the highest among the roofless participants (40%). Conclusions: Homeless people have much poorer health and they utilize health services less than the most disadvantaged quintile of the general population. There is a clear social gradient within the homeless population, as well, which calls for integrated approaches for specific interventions to improve their health.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 43 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Nagy-Borsy, E., Vági, Z., Skerlecz, P., Szeitl, B., Kiss, I., & Rákosy, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Pecs (HU)
- TÁRKI Social Research Institute (HU)
- Corresponding author
- Rákosy, Zsuzsa
- Venue
- Archives of Public Health
- Published
- 2021-02-02
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-15
- ISSN
- 0778-7367 (ISSN-L)
- 2049-3258
- PMC
- PMC7852122
- OpenAlex
- W3126655876
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Archives of Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Általános Orvostudományi Kar, Pécsi Tudományegyetem
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Romani and Gypsy Studies
- Keywords
- homelessness, health status, health behavior, chronic disease, multimorbidity, morbidity, smoking, alcohol consumption, health care utilization, social gradient, low-income populations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review