Strategies to support substance use disorder care transitions from acute-care to community-based settings: a scoping review and typology
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Acute-care interventions that identify patients with substance use disorders (SUDs), initiate treatment, and link patients to community-based services, have proliferated in recent years. Yet, much is unknown about the specific strategies being used to support continuity of care from emergency department (ED) or inpatient hospital settings to community-based SUD treatment. In this scoping review, we synthesize the existing literature on patient transition interventions, and form an initial typology of reported strategies. Methods: We searched Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO for peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2021 that studied interventions linking patients with SUD from ED or inpatient hospital settings to community-based SUD services. Eligible articles measured at least one post-discharge treatment outcome and included a description of the strategy used to promote linkage to community care. Detailed information was extracted on the components of the transition strategies and a thematic coding process was used to categorize strategies into a typology based on shared characteristics. Facilitators and barriers to transitions of care were synthesized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results: Forty-five articles met inclusion criteria. 62% included ED interventions and 44% inpatient interventions. The majority focused on patients with opioid (71%) or alcohol (31%) use disorder. The transition strategies reported across studies were heterogeneous and often not well described. An initial typology of ten transition strategies, including five pre- and five post-discharge transition strategies is proposed. The most common strategy was scheduling an appointment with a community-based treatment provider prior to discharge. A range of facilitators and barriers were described, which can inform efforts to improve hospital-to-community transitions of care. Conclusions: Strategies to support transitions from acute-care to community-based SUD services, although critical for ensuring continuity of care, vary greatly across interventions and are inconsistently measured and described. More research is needed to classify SUD care transition strategies, understand their components, and explore which lead to the best patient outcomes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., et al. (2018) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m18-0850 · Cited by 43,565 · see citing works
Englander, H., Dobbertin, K., Lind, B. K., Nicolaidis, C., Graven, P., Dorfman, C., & Korthuis, P. T. (2019) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05251-9 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Touchpoints—opportunities to predict and prevent opioid overdose: a cohort study.
Larochelle, M. R., Bernstein, R., Bernson, D., Land, T., Stopka, T. J., Rose, A. J., Bharel, M., Liebschutz, J. M., & Walley, A. Y. (2019) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.06.039 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Glass, J. E., Hamilton, A. M., Powell, B. J., Perron, B. E., Brown, R. T., & Ilgen, M. A. (2015) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.12950 · Cited by 168 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions in improving linkage to treatment following hospital discharge has been mixed [12], with interventions offering initiation of MOUD showing more promise in recent years [13, 14].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialVendetti, J., Gmyrek, A., Damon, D., Singh, M., McRee, B., & Del Boca, F. (2017) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.13652 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Krawczyk, N., Rivera, B. D., Chang, J. E., Grivel, M., Chen, Y.-H., Nagappala, S., Englander, H., & McNeely, J.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Temple University (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Krawczyk, Noa
- Venue
- Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
- Published
- 2023-11-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-67
- ISSN
- 1940-0632 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-0640
- PMC
- PMC10621088
- OpenAlex
- W4388226455
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Addiction Science & Clinical Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01DA055758, R34DA055228)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Keywords
- substance use disorders, care transitions, continuity of care, hospital-to-community transition, emergency department interventions, opioid use disorder, alcoholism, implementation barriers and facilitators, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review