Calling the police: theoretical insights and practical implications
Open accessAbstract
Studying whether, why, and how people call the police when they experience or witness a crime is crucial for understanding crime patterns, improving the accuracy of crime data, and shaping effective policing and criminal justice responses. Police-recorded crime statistics rely on public reporting, meaning that unreported crimes contribute to the ‘dark figure of crime’, distorting crime estimates and ultimately affecting practice and policy decisions. Understanding reporting behaviors helps identify and address barriers to reporting, including disparities across population groups and locations. This knowledge is essential for supporting evidence-based policing, improving victim support, and enhancing crime prevention strategies. This special collection comprises nine articles that advance theoretical explanations of crime reporting behavior and examine how calls for service shape demand for police services. The articles explore various aspects of crime reporting, including how perceptions of courts influence reporting behavior, how reporting channels impact victims’ satisfaction with the police, and how neighborhood characteristics such as racial composition, economic conditions, and mental health affect crime reporting propensities. Additionally, the collection contributes to understanding crime reporting behaviors for emerging forms of cyber-enabled crime such as cyberstalking and romance fraud. Finally, it explores spatial and temporal patterns of calls for service and proposes ways to better quantify police demand, enabling more informed management and prioritization of resources.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36
- Authors
- Buil-Gil, D., & Huey, L.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Venue
- Crime Science
- Published
- 2025-08-23
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2193-7680 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4413471102
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Crime Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- dark figure of crime, crime statistics, barriers to reporting, reporting channels, neighborhood characteristics, racial composition, economic conditions, mental health, cyberstalking, romance fraud, cyber-enabled crime, crime prevention, victim support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review