Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 574

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Earth microbial co-occurrence network reveals interconnection pattern across microbiomes

Open access
Ma, Bin, Wang, Yiling, Ye, Shudi, Liu, Shan, Stirling, Erinne, Gilbert, Jack A., Faust, Karoline, Knight, Rob, Jansson, Janet K., Cardona, Cesar, Röttjers, Lisa, Xu, Jianming·2020·Microbiome

Abstract

Background: Microbial interactions shape the structure and function of microbial communities; microbial co-occurrence networks in specific environments have been widely developed to explore these complex systems, but their interconnection pattern across microbiomes in various environments at the global scale remains unexplored. Here, we have inferred an Earth microbial co-occurrence network from a communal catalog with 23,595 samples and 12,646 exact sequence variants from 14 environments in the Earth Microbiome Project dataset. Results: This non-random scale-free Earth microbial co-occurrence network consisted of 8 taxonomy distinct modules linked with different environments, which featured environment specific microbial co-occurrence relationships. Different topological features of subnetworks inferred from datasets trimmed into uniform size indicate distinct co-occurrence patterns in the microbiomes of various environments. The high number of specialist edges highlights that environmental specific co-occurrence relationships are essential features across microbiomes. The microbiomes of various environments were clustered into two groups, which were mainly bridged by the microbiomes of plant and animal surface. Acidobacteria Gp2 and Nisaea were identified as hubs in most of subnetworks. Negative edges proportions ranged from 1.9% in the soil subnetwork to 48.9% the non-saline surface subnetwork, suggesting various environments experience distinct intensities of competition or niche differentiation. Conclusion: This investigation highlights the interconnection patterns across microbiomes in various environments and emphasizes the importance of understanding co-occurrence feature of microbiomes from a network perspective.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40168-020-00857-2

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 574

Metadata

Authors
Ma, B., Wang, Y., Ye, S., Liu, S., Stirling, E., Gilbert, J. A., Faust, K., Knight, R., Jansson, J. K., Cardona, C., Röttjers, L., & Xu, J.
Venue
Microbiome
Published
2020-06-04
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
82-82
ISSN
2049-2618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3033913804
Cited by
574
References
40
FWCI
29.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Earth microbial co-occurrence network reveals interconnection pattern across microbiomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40168-020-00857-2
The paper
Ma, B., Wang, Y., Ye, S., Liu, S., Stirling, E., Gilbert, J. A., Faust, K., Knight, R., Jansson, J. K., Cardona, C., Röttjers, L., & Xu, J. (2020). Earth microbial co-occurrence network reveals interconnection pattern across microbiomes. Microbiome. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00857-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.