The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Metaproteomics Initiative: a coordinated approach for propelling the functional characterization of microbiomes
Abstract
Through connecting genomic and metabolic information, metaproteomics is an essential approach for understanding how microbiomes function in space and time. The international metaproteomics community is delighted to announce the launch of the Metaproteomics Initiative (www.metaproteomics.org), the goal of which is to promote dissemination of metaproteomics fundamentals, advancements, and applications through collaborative networking in microbiome research. The Initiative aims to be the central information hub and open meeting place where newcomers and experts interact to communicate, standardize, and accelerate experimental and bioinformatic methodologies in this field. We invite the entire microbiome community to join and discuss potential synergies at the interfaces with other disciplines, and to collectively promote innovative approaches to gain deeper insights into microbiome functions and dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Metaproteomics, the study of proteins from complex samples containing multiple organisms, is attracting increasing interest [4, 5]. This strategy is based on the analysis of tandem mass spectrometry data acquired on proteolyzed proteins matched against a database comprising a selection of annotated genomes to provide the best possible taxonomic coverage. The peptides identified allow taxonomic and”
From Metaproteomic analysis of King Ghezo tomb wall (Abomey, Benin) confirms 19th century voodoo sacrifices (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Berg G, Rybakova D, Fischer D, Cernava T, Vergès M-CC, Charles T, et al. Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome. 2020;8:103. · DOI · Paper page
- Heintz-Buschart A, Wilmes P. Human gut microbiome: function matters. Trends Microbiol. 2018;26:563–74. · DOI
- Zhang X, Li L, Butcher J, Stintzi A, Figeys D. Advancing functional and translational microbiome research using meta-omics approaches. Microbiome. 2019;7:154. · DOI
- Schiebenhoefer H, Van Den Bossche T, Fuchs S, Renard BY, Muth T, Martens L. Challenges and promise at the interface of metaproteomics and genomics: an overview of recent progress in metaproteogenomic data analysis. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2019;16:375–90. · DOI
- Karaduta O, Dvanajscak Z, Zybailov B. Metaproteomics-an advantageous option in studies of host-microbiota interaction. Microorganisms. 2021;9 Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9050980. · DOI
- Saito MA, Bertrand EM, Duffy ME, Gaylord DA, Held NA, Hervey WJ 4th, et al. Progress and challenges in ocean metaproteomics and proposed best practices for data sharing. J Proteome Res. 2019;18:1461–76. · DOI
- Issa Isaac N, Philippe D, Nicholas A, Raoult D, Eric C. Metaproteomics of the human gut microbiota: Challenges and contributions to other OMICS. Clin Mass Spectrom. Elsevier BV. 2019;14:18–30. · DOI
- Kleiner M. Metaproteomics: much more than measuring gene expression in microbial communities. mSystems. 2019;4 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00115-19. · DOI
- McGivern BB, Tfaily MM, Borton MA, Kosina SM, Daly RA, Nicora CD, et al. Decrypting bacterial polyphenol metabolism in an anoxic wetland soil. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2466. · DOI
- Kleiner M, Wentrup C, Lott C, Teeling H, Wetzel S, Young J, et al. Metaproteomics of a gutless marine worm and its symbiotic microbial community reveal unusual pathways for carbon and energy use. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:E1173–82. · DOI
- Biemann R, Buß E, Benndorf D, Lehmann T, Schallert K, Püttker S, et al. Fecal metaproteomics reveals reduced gut inflammation and changed microbial metabolism following lifestyle-induced weight loss. Biomolecules. 2021;11 Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11050726. · DOI
- Van Den Bossche T, Kunath BJ, Schallert K, Schäpe SS, Abraham PE, Armengaud J, et al. Critical assessment of metaproteome investigation (CAMPI): A multi-lab comparison of established workflows. bioRxiv. 2021; Available from: http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2021.03.05.433915. · DOI
- Wilmes P, Heintz-Buschart A, Bond PL. A decade of metaproteomics: where we stand and what the future holds. Proteomics. 2015;15:3409–17. · DOI
- Sunagawa S, Acinas SG, Bork P, Bowler C, Tara Oceans Coordinators, Eveillard D, et al. Tara Oceans: towards global ocean ecosystems biology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18:428–45. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Charlier, P., Bourdin, V., N'Dah, D., Kielbasa, M., Pible, O., & Armengaud, J. (2024) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.202400048 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Den Bossche, T., Arntzen, M. Ø., Becher, D., Benndorf, D., Eijsink, V. G. H., Henry, C., Jagtap, P. D., Jehmlich, N., Juste, C., Kunath, B. J., Mesuere, B., Muth, T., Pope, P. B., Seifert, J., Tanca, A., Uzzau, S., Wilmes, P., Hettich, R. L., & Armengaud, J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Microbiome
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2049-2618
- PMC
- PMC8690404
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
