The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In-process sensing in selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing
Open accessAbstract
Additive manufacturing and specifically metal selective laser melting (SLM) processes are rapidly being industrialized. In order for this technology to see more widespread use as a production modality, especially in heavily regulated industries such as aerospace and medical device manufacturing, there is a need for robust process monitoring and control capabilities to be developed that reduce process variation and ensure quality. The current state of the art of such process monitoring technology is reviewed in this paper. The SLM process itself presents significant challenges as over 50 different process input variables impact the characteristics of the finished part. Understanding the impact of feed powder characteristics remains a challenge. Though many powder characterization techniques have been developed, there is a need for standardization of methods most relevant to additive manufacturing. In-process sensing technologies have primarily focused on monitoring melt pool signatures, either from a Lagrangian reference frame that follows the focal point of the laser or from a fixed Eulerian reference frame. Correlations between process measurements, process parameter settings, and quality metrics to date have been primarily qualitative. Some simple, first-generation process control strategies have also been demonstrated based on these measures. There remains a need for connecting process measurements to process models to enable robust model-based control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Frazier, W. E. (2014) · Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance · doi:10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z · Cited by 5,984
Cited by
Process defects and in situ monitoring methods in metal powder bed fusion: a review
Grasso, M., & Colosimo, B. M. (2017) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/aa5c4f · Cited by 833
Melt pool temperature and cooling rates in laser powder bed fusion
Hooper, P. A. (2018) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.032 · Cited by 707
An overview of residual stresses in metal powder bed fusion
Bartlett, J. L., & Li, X. (2019) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.02.020 · Cited by 616
Additive Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Review
Zhou, L., Miller, J., Vezza, J., Mayster, M., Raffay, M., Justice, Q., Al Tamimi, Z., Hansotte, G., Sunkara, L. D., & Bernat, J. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24092668 · Cited by 599
Scime, L., & Beuth, J. (2018) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.009 · Cited by 489
Metadata
- Authors
- Spears, T. G., & Gold, S. A.
- Venue
- Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation
- Published
- 2016-02-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-40
- ISSN
- 2193-9764 (ISSN-L)
- 2193-9772
- OpenAlex
- W2272112894
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In-process sensing in selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40192-016-0045-4
- The paper
- Spears, T. G., & Gold, S. A. (2016). In-process sensing in selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing. Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-016-0045-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.