The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A model for rigorously applying the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework in the design and measurement of a large scale collaborative multi-site study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: This paper describes the means by which a United States National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)-funded cooperative, Juvenile Justice-Translational Research on Interventions for Adolescents in the Legal System (JJ-TRIALS), utilized an established implementation science framework in conducting a multi-site, multi-research center implementation intervention initiative. The initiative aimed to bolster the ability of juvenile justice agencies to address unmet client needs related to substance use while enhancing inter-organizational relationships between juvenile justice and local behavioral health partners. METHODS: The EPIS (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment) framework was selected and utilized as the guiding model from inception through project completion; including the mapping of implementation strategies to EPIS stages, articulation of research questions, and selection, content, and timing of measurement protocols. Among other key developments, the project led to a reconceptualization of its governing implementation science framework into cyclical form as the EPIS Wheel. The EPIS Wheel is more consistent with rapid-cycle testing principles and permits researchers to track both progressive and recursive movement through EPIS. Moreover, because this randomized controlled trial was predicated on a bundled strategy method, JJ-TRIALS was designed to rigorously test progress through the EPIS stages as promoted by facilitation of data-driven decision making principles. The project extended EPIS by (1) elucidating the role and nature of recursive activity in promoting change (yielding the circular EPIS Wheel), (2) by expanding the applicability of the EPIS framework beyond a single evidence-based practice (EBP) to address varying process improvement efforts (representing varying EBPs), and (3) by disentangling outcome measures of progression through EPIS stages from the a priori established study timeline. DISCUSSION: The utilization of EPIS in JJ-TRIALS provides a model for practical and applied use of implementation frameworks in real-world settings that span outer service system and inner organizational contexts in improving care for vulnerable populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02672150 . Retrospectively registered on 22 January 2016.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures




Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Future studies that include an EPIS adoption decision phase is warranted as both theoretical and research-based publications related to the EPIS framework indicate that an adoption decision is the end result of the Exploration Phase (Becan et al., 2018; Nilsen, 2015).”
From Implementation-as-Usual in Community-Based Organizations Providing Specialized Services to Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Mixed Methods Study (2021) · cites this paper as Becan et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 · Cited by 14,496
Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 · Cited by 8,721
Self-citationMaking sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks
Nilsen, P. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0 · Cited by 4,447
Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors
Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7 · Cited by 3,240 · cited 9×
“It was initially designed for implementation science research focused on public sector services including mental health and child welfare, and similarly organized systems such as substance use disorder treatment (Aarons et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationImplementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting
Proctor, E. K., Powell, B. J., & McMillen, J. C. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-139 · Cited by 2,585
Proctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., & Mittman, B. (2009) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4 · Cited by 1,894
Self-citationBridging Research and Practice
Tabak, R. G., Khoong, E. C., Chambers, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2012) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024 · Cited by 1,386
Aarons, G. A. (2004) · Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1023/b:mhsr.0000024351.12294.65 · Cited by 1,272
Self-citationA compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health
Powell, B. J., McMillen, J. C., Proctor, E. K., Carpenter, C. R., Griffey, R. T., Bunger, A. C., Glass, J. E., & York, J. L. (2012) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558711430690 · Cited by 1,069
Planning and Studying Improvement in Patient Care: The Use of Theoretical Perspectives
GROL, R. P. T. M., BOSCH, M. C., HULSCHER, M. E. J. L., ECCLES, M. P., & WENSING, M. (2007) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00478.x · Cited by 943
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–121 of 121
Martin, M., Lachman, J., Wamoyi, J., Shenderovich, Y., Wambura, M., Mgunga, S., Ndyetabura, E., Ally, A., Barankena, A., Exavery, A., et al. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14634228
Martin, M., Lachman, J., Wamoyi, J., Shenderovich, Y., Wambura, M., Mgunga, S., Ndyetabura, E., Ally, A., Barankena, A., Exavery, A., et al. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14634231
Martin, M., Lachman, J., Wamoyi, J., Shenderovich, Y., Wambura, M., Mgunga, S., Ndyetabura, E., Ally, A., Barankena, A., Exavery, A., et al. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14634225
Louie, E., Barrett, E. L., Baillie, A., Haber, P., & Morley, K. C. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14168044
Schwarz, U. V. T., Giannotta, F., Neher, M., Zetterlund, J., & Hasson, H. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14228080
Additional file 1 of Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review
Proctor, E. K., Bunger, A. C., Lengnick‐Hall, R., Gerke, D. R., Martin, J. K., Phillips, R. J., & Swanson, J. C. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26606383
Martin, M., Lachman, J., Wamoyi, J., Shenderovich, Y., Wambura, M., Mgunga, S., Ndyetabura, E., Ally, A., Barankena, A., Exavery, A., et al. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14634237
Martin, M., Lachman, J., Wamoyi, J., Shenderovich, Y., Wambura, M., Mgunga, S., Ndyetabura, E., Ally, A., Barankena, A., Exavery, A., et al. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14634234
Crable, E. L., Lengnick‐Hall, R., Stadnick, N. A., Moullin, J. C., & Aarons, G. A. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26553113
Self-citationPhoto coding: a pragmatic approach to measuring intervention fidelity in a pharmacy system re-design
Resendiz, S. M., Mai, S., Gilson, A. M., Stone, J. A., Hoffins, E. L., Chladek, J. S., Watterson, T. L., Moore, K. G., & Chui, M. A. (2025) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-025-00849-z
Shanley, D. C., Page, M., Shelton, D., Harbeck, E., Ware, R. S., Byrnes, J., Zimmer‐Gembeck, M. J., Towers, K., Brown, N. J., Marshall, J., et al. (2026) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13828-w
Pak, A. C., Neyra, J. A., Brown, J. R., Travers, C. P., Starr, M. C., Harer, M. W., Sullivan, I., MacKenzie, T. A., Colicchio, T. K., Griffin, R., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1706165
An Implementation Science Approach to Assess Law Enforcement Deflection Programs
Ratemo, S., Suiter, E. A., McLean, K. D., Shneibaum, N., & Miller, B. L. (2026) · Justice Evaluation Journal · doi:10.1080/24751979.2026.2651743
Smith, A., Kulkarni, D., Dubrin-Meneses, S., Jones, R. M., Deutsch, J. M., Kurtz, J., Hong, I., Kane, H., Virudachalam, S., Kumanyika, S., et al. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8902980/v1
Reid, C. J., Church, C., Jeffery, V., Tse, K. C., Freeman, A., Sia, C., Wen, R., Phillips, J., & Ashcroft, M. (2026) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-026-00991-2
Rhee, K. E., Hiller-Venegas, S., Viglione, C., Polich, M., Huang, J. S., Kim, J. J., Bajwa, M. S., Zive, M., Eichen, D. M., Strong, D. R., et al. (2026) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-026-01025-7
Cedillo, M., Zepeda, J., Wu, C., Molina, I. T., & Conroy, M. B. (2026) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibag054
Hu, Z., Han, L., Yang, D., Zhang, X., Shen, W.-T., Wang, Y.-T., Zhang, F.-S., Li, X., & Hao, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1877125
Mitchell, A. M., Elkington, K. S., Hoepstine, K., Campos, S., Garcia, A., Christofferson, M., & Tross, S. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10285736/v1
Edwards, E. E., Choate, S. A., Decker, H. R., Roberson, P., Jacola, M., Priddy, M., & Schaefer, B. P. (2026) · Journal of Community Health · doi:10.1007/s10900-026-01636-0
So, M., Brar, P., Woodlee, C. H., Worley, J., Kaja, S. M., McRee, A., Mehus, C. J., & O’Brien, J. R. G. (2026) · Community Health Equity Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/2752535x261496350
Metadata
- Authors
- Becan, J. E., Bartkowski, J. P., Knight, D. K., Wiley, T. R. A., DiClemente, R., Ducharme, L., Welsh, W. N., Bowser, D., McCollister, K., Hiller, M., Spaulding, A. C., Flynn, P. M., Swartzendruber, A., Dickson, M. F., Fisher, J. H., & Aarons, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Texas Christian University (US)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
- Emory University (US)
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (US)
- Temple University (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Becan, Jennifer E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Health & Justice
- Published
- 2018-04-13
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-9
- ISSN
- 2194-7899 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5899075
- OpenAlex
- W2799439473
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 16.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health & Justice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- TUScholarShare (Temple University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (U01DA036221, U01DA036226, U01DA036233, U01DA036176, U01DA036225, U01DA036224, U01DA036158, R21DA044378)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Keywords
- EPIS framework, implementation science, juvenile justice, substance use, implementation strategies, outcome measurement, interorganizational relationships, data-driven decision making, vulnerable populations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review