Cited by 191Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersInflammatory Bowel DiseaseMicroscopic Colitis

Early introduction of selective immunosuppressive therapy associated with favorable clinical outcomes in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis

Open access
Abu-Sbeih, Hamzah, Ali, Faisal S., Wang, Xuemei, Mallepally, Niharika, Chen, Ellie, Altan, Mehmet, Bresalier, Robert S., Charabaty, Aline +4 more·2019·Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current treatment guidelines for immune-mediated colitis (IMC) recommend 4 to 6 weeks of steroids as first-line therapy, followed by selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) (infliximab or vedolizumab) in patients who do not respond to steroids. We assessed the effect of early SIT introduction and number of SIT infusions on clinical outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with IMC who received SIT at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between January and December 2018. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations between clinical outcomes and features of IMC. RESULTS: Of the 1459 patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors, 179 developed IMC of any grade; 84 of these 179 patients received SIT. Of the 84 patients who received SIT, 79% were males, and the mean age was 60 years (standard deviation, 14). Compared with patients who received SIT > 10 days after IMC onset, patients who received early SIT (≤10 days) required fewer hospitalizations (P = 0.03), experienced steroid taper failure less frequently (P = 0.03), had fewer steroid tapering attempts (P < 0.01), had a shorter course of steroid treatment (P = 0.09), and had a shorter duration of symptoms (P < 0.01). Patients who received one or two infusions of SIT achieved histologic remission less frequently (P = 0.09) and had higher fecal calprotectin levels after SIT (P = 0.01) compared with patients who received three or more infusions. Risk factors for IMC recurrence after weaning off steroids included: 1) needing multiple hospitalizations, 2) experiencing steroid taper failure after SIT, 3) receiving infliximab rather than vedolizumab, 4) receiving fewer than three infusions of SIT, 5) having higher fecal calprotectin levels after SIT, and 6) receiving a longer course of steroids, hospitalization and IMC symptoms. Unsuccessful weaning from steroids after SIT was associated with high IMC grades; multiple hospitalizations; steroid-resistant IMC; long interval from IMC to SIT initiation; and long duration of steroids, IMC symptoms, and hospitalization. CONCLUSION: SIT should be introduced early in the disease course of IMC instead of waiting until failure of steroid therapy or steroid taper. Patients who received three or more infusions of SIT had more favorable clinical outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40425-019-0577-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 191

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Common terminology criteria for adverse events (ctcae) v5.0. Https://ctep.Cancer.Gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcae_v5_quick_reference_8.5x11.pdf, 2018. 15818867

Authors
Abu-Sbeih, H., Ali, F. S., Wang, X., Mallepally, N., Chen, E., Altan, M., Bresalier, R. S., Charabaty, A., Dadu, R., Jazaeri, A., Lashner, B., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Yinghong
Venue
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-04-02
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
93-93
ISSN
2051-1426 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2931644395
Cited by
191
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 12
FWCI
10.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA016672)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Microscopic Colitis
Keywords
immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis, immune-related colitis, early treatment initiation, infliximab, vedolizumab, steroid weaning, fecal calprotectin, histological remission, immune checkpoint inhibitors, hospitalization, symptom duration
MeSH terms
Infliximab, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Aged, Colitis, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Gastrointestinal Agents, Glucocorticoids, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, B7-H1 Antigen, CTLA-4 Antigen, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Time-to-Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review