Cited by 93Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Dipeptide repeat protein inclusions are rare in the spinal cord and almost absent from motor neurons in C9ORF72 mutant amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and are unlikely to cause their degeneration

Open access
Gomez-Deza, Jorge, Lee, Youn-bok, Troakes, Claire, Nolan, Matthew, Al-Sarraj, Safa, Gallo, Jean-Marc, Shaw, Christopher E.·2015·Acta Neuropathologica Communications

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cytoplasmic TDP-43 inclusions are the pathological hallmark of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and tau-negative frontotemporal lobar dementia (FTLD). The G4C2 repeat mutation in C9ORF72 is the most common cause of ALS and FTLD in which, in addition to TDP-43 inclusions, five different di-peptide repeat (DPR) proteins have been identified. Di-peptide repeat proteins are translated in a non-canonical fashion from sense and antisense transcripts of the G4C2 repeat (GP, GA, GR, PA, PR). DPR inclusions are abundant in the cerebellum, as well as in the frontal and temporal lobes of ALS and FTLD patients and some are neurotoxic in a range of cellular and animal models, implying that DPR aggregation directly contributes to disease pathogenesis. Here we sought to quantify inclusions for each DPR and TDP-43 in ALS cases with and without the C9ORF72 mutation. We characterised the abundance of DPRs and their cellular location and compared this to cytoplasmic TDP-43 inclusions in order to explore the role of each inclusion in lower motor neuron degeneration. RESULTS: Spinal cord sections from ten cases positive for the C9ORF72 repeat expansion (ALS-C9+ve) and five cases that were not were probed by double immunofluorescence staining for individual DPRs and TDP-43. Inclusions immunoreactive for each of the DPRs were present in the spinal cord but they were rare or very rare in abundance (in descending order of frequency: GA, GP, GR, PA and PR). TDP-43 cytoplasmic inclusions were 45- to 750-fold more frequent than any DPR, and fewer than 4 % of DPR inclusions colocalized with TDP-43 inclusions. In motor neurons, a single cytoplasmic DPR inclusion was detected (0.1 %) in contrast to the 34 % of motor neurons that contained cytoplasmic TDP-43 inclusions. Furthermore, the number of TDP-43 inclusions in ALS cases with and without the C9ORF72 mutation was nearly identical. CONCLUSIONS: For all other neurodegenerative diseases, the neurotoxic protein aggregates are detected in the affected population of neurons. TDP-43 cytoplasmic aggregation is the dominant feature of ALS spinal cord pathology irrespective of C9ORF72 mutation status. The near absence of DPR inclusions in spinal cord motor neurons challenges their contribution to lower motor neuron degeneration in ALS-C9+ve cases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40478-015-0218-y

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DPR inclusions rarely co-label with TARDBP pathological inclusions and are mainly found in areas of the CNS that are not pathologically affected, arguing against a direct role for DPRs in neurodegeneration.

    “On the other hand, DPR inclusions rarely co-label with TARDBP pathological inclusions and are mainly found in areas of the CNS that are not pathologically affected [171,174–177], arguing against a direct role for DPRs in neurodegeneration.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 93

Authors
Gomez-Deza, J., Lee, Y.-B., Troakes, C., Nolan, M., Al-Sarraj, S., Gallo, J.-M., & Shaw, C. E.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Shaw, Christopher E.
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
Published
2015-06-25
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
38-38
ISSN
2051-5960 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165254352
Cited by
93
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (089701)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
dipeptide repeat proteins, C9orf72, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, TDP-43 inclusions, motor neuron degeneration, G4C2 repeat expansion, protein aggregation, spinal cord, neurotoxicity, pathogenesis, non-canonical translation, antisense transcripts
MeSH terms
C9orf72 Protein, Adult, Aged, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Dipeptides, DNA-Binding Proteins, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Neurons, Proteins, Spinal Cord, DNA Repeat Expansion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review