Cited by 62Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Revisiting rodent models: Octodon degus as Alzheimer’s disease model?

Open access
Steffen, Johannes, Krohn, Markus, Paarmann, Kristin, Schwitlick, Christina, Brüning, Thomas, Marreiros, Rita, Müller-Schiffmann, Andreas, Korth, Carsten +2 more·2016·Acta Neuropathologica Communications

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease primarily occurs as sporadic disease and is accompanied with vast socio-economic problems. The mandatory basic research relies on robust and reliable disease models to overcome increasing incidence and emerging social challenges. Rodent models are most efficient, versatile, and predominantly used in research. However, only highly artificial and mostly genetically modified models are available. As these 'engineered' models reproduce only isolated features, researchers demand more suitable models of sporadic neurodegenerative diseases. One very promising animal model was the South American rodent Octodon degus, which was repeatedly described as natural 'sporadic Alzheimer's disease model' with 'Alzheimer's disease-like neuropathology'. To unveil advantages over the 'artificial' mouse models, we re-evaluated the age-dependent, neurohistological changes in young and aged Octodon degus (1 to 5-years-old) bred in a wild-type colony in Germany. In our hands, extensive neuropathological analyses of young and aged animals revealed normal age-related cortical changes without obvious signs for extensive degeneration as seen in patients with dementia. Neither significant neuronal loss nor enhanced microglial activation were observed in aged animals. Silver impregnation methods, conventional, and immunohistological stains as well as biochemical fractionations revealed neither amyloid accumulation nor tangle formation. Phosphoepitope-specific antibodies against tau species displayed similar intraneuronal reactivity in both, young and aged Octodon degus.In contrast to previous results, our study suggests that Octodon degus born and bred in captivity do not inevitably develop cortical amyloidosis, tangle formation or neuronal loss as seen in Alzheimer's disease patients or transgenic disease models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40478-016-0363-y

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Octodon degu AD-associated pathology appears inconsistent as other studies do report any AD associated pathology in aged animals.

    “However this pathology appears to be inconsistent as other studies do report any AD associated pathology in aged animals [149].”

    From Alzheimer's disease: experimental models and reality (2017) · cites this paper as [149]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 62

Authors
Steffen, J., Krohn, M., Paarmann, K., Schwitlick, C., Brüning, T., Marreiros, R., Müller-Schiffmann, A., Korth, C., Braun, K., & Pahnke, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Lübeck (DE)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Pahnke, Jens
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
Published
2016-08-26
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
91-91
ISSN
2051-5960 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2513378585
Cited by
62
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (UBICA, TRANS-GEN)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG930/9, DFG930/12)
  • Norges Forskningsråd (NFR247179, NFR260786)
  • VIAA Latvia (NFI/R/2014/023)
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft (SAW-2015-IPB-2)
  • Helse Sør-Øst RHF (2016062)
  • German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development
  • EU FP7 (MC-ITN IN-SENS #607616))
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Octodon degus, Alzheimer's disease, animal models of dementia, amyloid accumulation, neurofibrillary tangles, tau phosphorylation, microglial activation, neuronal loss
MeSH terms
Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Blotting, Western, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Octodon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review