Cited by 3Cultural Heritage Materials AnalysisConservation Techniques and StudiesHistorical Art and Architecture Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analytical investigation of the feather decoration technique of a seventeenth to eighteenth century Chinese imperial hanging screen

Open access
Gu, An, Wang, Na, Kong, Yan-ju, Hou, Jia-yu, Li, Gen, Lei, Yong·2021·Heritage Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Decoration with feathers is a universal phenomenon in human history. Objects decorated with feathers were regarded as fine artworks and hence were enormously prized. In ancient China, dotting a surface with blue kingfisher feathers was a famous, complex and delicate decoration technique called diancui. Although various ancient diancui artworks appear in many museums around the world and researchers have realized significant results in studies of the history, technique and conservation of diancui, some key historical details are still not clear. In this research performed during restoration, an important object from the Palace Museum, the “Feather Decoration Hanging Screen with Birds and Flowers Pattern”, was analyzed by various scientific technologies. This object is a Chinese imperial artwork of the Qing dynasty (seventeenth to eighteenth century) decorated with kingfisher feathers and the feathers of several other birds, and it represents the highest level of this period. As a typical and valuable case, the results provide important clues for solving questions arising from related academic fields.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40494-021-00555-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Doughty RW. Feather fashions and bird preservation: a study in nature protection. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1975.
  2. Reina RE, Kensinger KM, editors. The gift of birds: featherwork of native South American peoples. Philadelphia: The University Museum; 1991.
  3. Zhu Z, Tan P, Yang J, Ge H, Liu L. Mass spectrometric identification of adhesive utilized in a Tian-tsui Tiara of the mid-Qing Dynasty (1776–1839 CE) in the Collection of the Tang Clan Folk Museum. Stud Conserv. 2019;64:187–92. · DOI
  4. Jackson B. Kingfisher blue: treasures of an ancient Chinese art. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press; 2001.
  5. Paulson M. Visible effects of adhesive and pressure on color in kingfisher feathers. Los Angeles: UCLA; 2018.
  6. Chandler AC (1916) A study of the structure of feathers, with reference to their taxonomic significance, by Asa C. Chandler. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.15062 · DOI
  7. Davies A. Micromorphology of feathers using the scanning electron microscope. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1970;10:165–74. · DOI
  8. Robertson J, Harkin C, Govan J. The identification of bird feathers. scheme for feather examination. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1984;24:85–98. · DOI
  9. Lee E, Bae H, Jeon D-J, Ji S, Yeo J-S, Kim J. Microstructures in blue feathers of the common kingfisher. Proc Natl Inst Ecol Republic of Korea. 2021;2:21–5.
  10. Stavenga DG, Tinbergen J, Leertouwer HL, Wilts BD. Kingfisher feathers—colouration by pigments, spongy nanostructures and thin films. J Exp Biol. 2011;214:3960–7. · DOI
  11. Zhang Q, Hao LV, Zhao Q, Wang X. The color analysis of peacock feather. Spectrosc Spectr Anal. 2013;33:632–5.
  12. Derrick MR, Stulik D, Landry JM. Infrared spectroscopy in conservation science. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute; 1999.
  13. Reich S, Thomsen C. Raman spectroscopy of graphite. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A. 2004;362:2271–88. · DOI
  14. Gettens RJ, Stout GL. Painting materials: a short encyclopaedia. New York: Dover Publications; 1966.
  15. Larkin P. Infrared and raman spectroscopy: principles and spectral interpretation. Boston: Elsevier; 2011.
  16. Wang J. Papermaking raw materials of china an atlas of micrographs and the characteristics of fibers. Beijing: China Light Industry Press; 1999.
  17. Jiang Y, Wang R, Feng L, Zhang D. Mechanochromic response of the barbules in peacock tail feather. Opt Mater. 2018;75:74–8. · DOI
  18. Burgess SC, King A, Hyde R. An analysis of optimal structural features in the peacock tail feather. Opt Laser Technol. 2006;38:329–34. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Gu, A., Wang, N., Kong, Y.-J., Hou, J.-Y., Li, G., & Lei, Y.
Affiliations
Palace Museum (CN)
Corresponding author
Gu, An
Venue
Heritage Science
Published
2021-07-09
Volume
9
Issue
1
ISSN
2050-7445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3179977615
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heritage Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFC1520300)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Conservation Techniques and Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Historical Art and Architecture Studies
Keywords
Qing dynasty, Palace Museum, decorative arts, restoration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review