CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18Psychometric Methodologies and TestingSchool Choice and PerformanceIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Home resources as a measure of socio-economic status in Ghana

Open access
Bofah, Emmanuel Adu-tutu, Hannula, Markku S.·2017·Large-scale Assessments in Education
DOI 10.1186/s40536-017-0039-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In large scale international assessment studies, questionnaires are typical used to query students’ home possessions. Composite scores are computed from responses to the home resource questionnaires and are used as a measure of family socioeconomic background in achievement comparison or for statistical control. This paper deals with profiling the socio-economic status (SES) of Ghanaian students’ in the context of the TIMSS 2011 study. Latent class analysis was used to profile students into respective SES classes based on the students’ responses to 11 questions concerning their home resources. The results showed three clearly distinct socio-economic profiles: high-, middle- and low-SES. Moreover, a discriminate analysis was conducted to explore the degree to which the groups are accurately classified. The discriminant analysis was able to correctly classify 92.20% of the individual students into their appropriate SES group. A gender comparison of these classes suggested stable measurement invariance for the latent class indicators. This article contributes to addressing the composition of SES by providing statistical criteria to evaluate SES using empirical data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40536-017-0039-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SES has been commonly used as a latent construct for measuring family background.

    “SES has been commonly used as a latent construct for measuring family background (Bofah and Hannula 2017).”

    From Socioeconomic Inequality and Educational Outcomes (2019) · cites this paper as Bofah and Hannula 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Aikens, N. L., & Barbarin, O. (2008). Socioeconomic differences in reading trajectories: The contribution of family, neigh- borhood, and school contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 235-251. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.235. · DOI
  2. Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Scribner, J. P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 Coun- tries. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369-387. doi:10.3102/0013189X07308739. · DOI
  3. Bofah, E. A. (2015). Reciprocal determinism between students' mathematics self-concept and achievement in an African context. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 9), Prague (pp. 1688-1694). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01287995/
  4. Bosker, R., & Snijders, T. (2011). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  5. Bowden, M. P., & Doughney, J. (2009). Socio-economic status, cultural diversity and the aspirations of secondary students in the Western Suburbs of Melbourne, Australia. Higher Education, 59(1), 115-129. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9238-5. · DOI
  6. Buchmann, C. (2002). Measuring family background in international studies of education: Conceptual issues and methodological challenges. In A. C. Porter & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 150-197). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  7. Chow, A., Eccles, J. S., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2012). Task value profiles across subjects and aspirations to physical and IT-related sciences in the United States and Finland. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1612-1628. doi:10.1037/a0030194. · DOI
  8. Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. New York, NY: Wiley.
  9. Ensminger, M. E., & Fothergill, K. (2003). A decade of measuring SES: What it tells us and where to go from here. In M. H. Bornstein & R. H. Bradley (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development (pp. 13-27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  10. Entwistle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., & Olson, L. S. (1997). Children, schools, and inequality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  11. Fernald, A., Marchman, V. A., & Weisleder, A. (2013). SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evi- dent at 18 months. Developmental Science, 16(2), 234-248. doi:10.1111/desc.12019. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. (1999). The effect of household wealth on educational attainment: Evidence from 35 countries. Population and Development, 25(1), 85-420. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.1999.00085.x. · DOI
  13. Geiser, C. (2013). Data analysis with Mplus. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  14. Goodman, L. A. (1974). Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models. Biometrika, 61(2), 215-231. doi:10.1093/biomet/61.2.215. · DOI
  15. Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W., Illiam, C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pren- tice Hall.
  16. Hannula, M. S., Bofah, E. A., Tuohilampi, L., & Metsämuuronen, J. (2014). A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between mathematics-related affect and achievement in Finland. In S. Oesterle, P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (pp. 249-256). Vancouver, Canada: PME.
  17. Hauser, R. M. (1994). Measuring socioeconomic status in studies of child development. Child Development, 65(6), 1541-1545.
  18. Hauser, R. M., & Warren, J. R. (1996). Socioeconomic indexes for occupations : A review, update, and critique (No. 96-01). Madi- son, Wisconsin. doi:10.1111/1467-9531.271028. · DOI
  19. Hoff, E. (2003). Causes and consequences of SES-related differences in parent-to-child speech. In M. H. Bornstein & R. H. Bradley (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development (pp. 147-160).
  20. House, J. S. (1981). Social structure and personality. In M. Rosenberg & R. R. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 525-561). New York, NY: Basic Books.
  21. Jurdak, M. (2014). Socio-economic and cultural mediators of mathematics achievement and between-school equity in mathematics education at the global level. ZDM, 46, 1025-1037. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0593-z. · DOI
  22. Keeves, J. P., & Saha, L. J. (1997). Measurement of social background. In L. J. Saha (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the sociology of education (pp. 218-224). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
  23. Klebanov, P. K., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Duncan, G. J. (1994). Does neighborhood and family poverty affect mothers' parenting, mental health, and social support? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 441-455.
  24. Kupari, P., & Nissinen, K. (2013). Background factors behind mathematics achievement in Finnish education context: Explanatory models based on TIMSS 1999 and TIMSS 2011 data. In The 5th IEA International Research Conference (IRC- 2013). National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
  25. Langhout, R. D., Drake, P., & Rosselli, F. (2009). Classism in the university setting: Examining student antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. doi:10.1037/a0016209. · DOI
  26. Lee, V., & Croninger, R. (1994). The relative importance of home and school in the development of literacy skills for middle-grade students. American Journal of Education, 102(3), 286-329.
  27. Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767-778.
  28. Madarasova Geckova, A., Tavel, P., van Dijk, J. P., Abel, T., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2010). Factors associated with educational aspirations among adolescents: Cues to counteract socioeconomic differences? BMC Public Health, 10, 154. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-154. · DOI
  29. Markland, D. (2007). The golden rule is that there are no golden rules: A commentary on Paul Barrett's recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 851-858.
  30. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320-341.
  31. Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. S. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person-and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(2), 191-225. doi:10.1080/10705510902751010. · DOI · Paper page
  32. McKenzie, D. J. (2005). Measuring inequality with asset indicators. Journal of Population Economics, 18(2), 229-260. doi:10.1007/s00148-005-0224-7. · DOI
  33. McNeal, R. B., Jr. (1999). Parental involvement as social capital: Differential effectiveness on science achievement, truancy, and dropping out. Oxford University Press, 78(1), 117-144. doi:10.2307/3005792. · DOI
  34. Michaelowa, K., Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. (2001). Primary education quality in Francophone Sub-Saharan Africa: Determi- nants of learning achievement and efficiency considerations. World Development, 29(10), 1699-1716. doi:10.1016/ S0305-750X(01)00061-4. · DOI
  35. Muijs, D., Harris, A., Chapman, C., Stoll, L., & Russ, J. (2005). Improving schools in socio-economically disadvantaged areas: A review of research evidence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. doi:10.1076/sesi.15.2.149.30433. · DOI
  36. Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535-569.
  37. Oakes, J. M. (n.d.). Measuring socioeconomic status. In e-Source: Behavioral and Social Science Research (pp. 1-31). http:// www.esourceresearch.org.
  38. Oakes, J. M., & Rossi, P. H. (2003). The measurement of SES in health research: Current practice and steps toward a new approach. Social Science and Medicine, 56(4), 769-784. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00073-4. · DOI · Paper page
  39. OCED. (2011). Against the odds: Disadvantaged students who succeed in school. Retrieved from: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264090873-en. · DOI
  40. Ormrod, J. E. (2011). Educational psychology (7th ed.). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
  41. Park, H. (2008). The varied educational effects of parent-child communication: A comparative study of fourteen coun- tries. Comparative Education Review, 52(2), 219-243. doi:10.1086/528763. · DOI
  42. Parker, P. D., Schoon, I., Tsai, Y.-M., Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Achievement, agency, gender, and socio- economic background as predictors of postschool choices: A multicontext study. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1629-1642. doi:10.1037/a0029167. · DOI
  43. Pastor, D. A., Barron, K. E., Miller, B. J., & Davis, S. L. (2007). A latent profile analysis of college students' achievement goal orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(1), 8-47.
  44. Paxson, C., & Schady, N. (2007). Cognitive development among young children in Ecuador the roles of wealth, health, and parenting. The Journal of Human Resources, 42(1), 49-84. doi:10.3368/jhr.XLII.1.49. Perry, L. B. (2012). Causes and effects of school socio-economic composition? A review of the literature. Education and Society, 30(1), 19-35. · DOI
  45. Postlethwaite, T. (1999). International studies of educational achievement: Methodological issues (Vol. 6). Hong Kong: Com- parative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
  46. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys (Vol. 307). New York, NY: Wiley.
  47. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147.
  48. Siegler, R. S. (2009). Improving the numerical understanding of children from low-income families. Child Development Perspective, 3(2), 118-124.
  49. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
  50. Teachman, J. D. (1987). Family background, educational resources, and educational attainment. American Socioogical Review, 52, 548-557.
  51. Teachman, J. D., & Paasch, K. (1998). The family and educational aspiration. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(3), 704-714.
  52. Teachman, J. D., Paasch, K., & Carver, K. (1997). Social capital and the generation of human capital. Social Forces, 75(4), 1343-1359.
  53. Tofighi, D., & Enders, C. K. (2008). Identifying the correct number of classes in growth mixture models. In G. R. Hancock & K. M. Samuelsen (Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 317-341). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  54. Wang, L., Li, X., & Li, N. (2014). Socio-economic status and mathematics achievement in China: A review. ZDM, 46, 1051-1061. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0617-8. · DOI
  55. Williams, T., & Williams, K. (2010). Self-efficacy and performance in mathematics: Reciprocal determinism in 33 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 453-466. doi:10.1037/a0017271. · DOI
  56. Wong, R. S.-K. (1998). Multidimensional influences of family environment in education: The case of socialist Czechoslova- kia. Sociology of Education, 71(1), 1-22. doi:10.2307/2673219. · DOI
  57. Xu, J., & Hampden-Thompson, G. (2012). Cultural reproduction, cultural mobility, cultural resources, or trivial effect? A comparative approach to cultural capital and educational performance. Comparative Education Review. doi:10.1086/661289. · DOI
  58. Yang, Y., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2004). Measuring socioeconomic status at individual and collective levels. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(3), 259-288. doi:10.1076/edre.10.3.259.30268. · DOI
  59. Yeung, W. J., & Conley, D. (2008). Black-white achievement gap and family wealth. Child Development, 79(2), 303-324. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01127.x. · DOI
  60. Yeung, W. J., Linver, M. R., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2002). How money matters for young children's development: Parental investment and family processes. Child Development, 73(6), 1861-1879. doi:10.2307/3696422. · DOI
  61. Zhang, M. (2003). Links between school absenteeism and child poverty. Pastoral Care in Education, 21(1), 10-17.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bofah, E. A.-T., & Hannula, M. S.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Bofah, Emmanuel Adu-tutu
ORCID
Hannula, Markku S.
Venue
Large-scale Assessments in Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-01-26
Volume
5
Issue
1
ISSN
2196-0739 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s40536-017-0039-5
OpenAlex
W2582810329
Cited by
18
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Large-scale Assessments in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
home resources, socioeconomic status, TIMSS 2011, Ghanaian students, latent class analysis, measurement invariance, gender differences, student performance comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review