The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A survey and analysis of intrusion detection models based on CSE-CIC-IDS2018 Big Data
Open accessAbstract
The exponential growth in computer networks and network applications worldwide has been matched by a surge in cyberattacks. For this reason, datasets such as CSE-CIC-IDS2018 were created to train predictive models on network-based intrusion detection. These datasets are not meant to serve as repositories for signature-based detection systems, but rather to promote research on anomaly-based detection through various machine learning approaches. CSE-CIC-IDS2018 contains about 16,000,000 instances collected over the course of ten days. It is the most recent intrusion detection dataset that is big data, publicly available, and covers a wide range of attack types. This multi-class dataset has a class imbalance, with roughly 17% of the instances comprising attack (anomalous) traffic. Our survey work contributes several key findings. We determined that the best performance scores for each study, where available, were unexpectedly high overall, which may be due to overfitting. We also found that most of the works did not address class imbalance, the effects of which can bias results in a big data study. Lastly, we discovered that information on the data cleaning of CSE-CIC-IDS2018 was inadequate across the board, a finding that may indicate problems with reproducibility of experiments. In our survey, major research gaps have also been identified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree
(2017) · HAL · Cited by 10,512
He, H., & Garcia, E. A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2008.239 · Cited by 10,359
A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learning
Zhuang, F., Qi, Z., Duan, K., Xi, D., Zhu, Y., Zhu, H., Xiong, H., & He, Q. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2020.3004555 · Cited by 6,678
A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set
Tavallaee, M., Bagheri, E., Lu, W., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications · doi:10.1109/cisda.2009.5356528 · Cited by 5,396
Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization
Sharafaldin, I., Habibi Lashkari, A., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy · doi:10.5220/0006639801080116 · Cited by 5,318 · cited 2×
“Datasets such as CSE-CIC-IDS2018 [5] were created to train predictive models on anomaly-based intrusion detection for network traffic.”
BackgroundMethodComparing Individual Means in the Analysis of Variance
Tukey, J. W. (1949) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001913 · Cited by 4,246
A survey of deep neural network architectures and their applications
Liu, W., Wang, Z., Liu, X., Zeng, N., Liu, Y., & Alsaadi, F. E. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.12.038 · Cited by 3,239
A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networks
Buda, M., Maki, A., & Mazurowski, M. A. (2018) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2018.07.011 · Cited by 3,088 · cited 1×
“We point out that the use of AUC as a robust, standalone metric for class imbalance has been demonstrated in several studies [95–97].”
ResultA comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms
Bentéjac, C., Csörgő, A., & Martínez-Muñoz, G. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-020-09896-5 · Cited by 2,998
SMOTE for Learning from Imbalanced Data: Progress and Challenges, Marking the 15-year Anniversary
Fernandez, A., Garcia, S., Herrera, F., & Chawla, N. V. (2018) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.11192 · Cited by 2,219
Cited by
(2025) · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2026.101938 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Leevy, J. L., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Big Data
- Published
- 2020-11-23
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2196-1115 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3108630703
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 14.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey and analysis of intrusion detection models based on CSE-CIC-IDS2018 Big Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40537-020-00382-x
- The paper
- Leevy, J. L., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2020). A survey and analysis of intrusion detection models based on CSE-CIC-IDS2018 Big Data. Journal of Big Data. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-020-00382-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.