Cited by 52Educational Environments and Student OutcomesEducation and Learning InterventionsEngineering Education and Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A conceptual framework for designing smart learning environments

Open access
Freigang, Sirkka, Schlenker, Lars, Köhler, Thomas·2018·Smart Learning Environments

Abstract

The paper deals with the design of Smart Learning Environments (SLEs). Over and above that, it’s about the interconnection between SLEs and the internet of things. With the question of how an interdisciplinary approach can contribute to the design of SLEs together with the disciplines of education, computer science and architecture the study empirically applies data collected in 2016. The empirical research was initiated by consolidating the findings from transdisciplinary analyses of the literature in a hypothetical model for designing SLEs. This model pooled success factors from different spheres of influence and served as a tool for empirical research. A triangulation was used for facilitating a model-validation in the context of 7 expert interviews, 7 questionnaires as well as a workshop with training experts. The data analysis resulted in the development of a holistic, socio-technical framework.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40561-018-0076-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. E. Aarts, R.S. Harwig, in The invisible future: The seamless integration of technology in everyday life. Ambient intelligence (2002), pp. 235–250
  2. M. Ashcraft, G. Radvansky, Cognition (Pearson Education, UpperSaddleRiver, 2010)
  3. P. Brusilovsky, C. Peylo, Adaptive and intelligent web-based educational systems. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ (IJAIED). 13, 159–172 (2003) · DOI
  4. M. G. Domingo, Forner, J. A. M. Expanding the Learning Environment: Combining Physicality and Virtuality - The Internet of Things for eLearning (S. 730–731). IEEE. (2010) https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2010.211 · DOI
  5. S. Doorley, S. Witthoft, Make Space: How to Set the Stage for Creative Collaboration (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J, 2012)
  6. M. Ebner, S. Schön, BIMS, Lehrbuch für Lernen und Lehren mit Technologien: [L3T] ([Stand:] Mai 2011) (Books on Demand, Norderstedt, 2011)
  7. O. Eigenbrod, R. Stang, Formierungen von Wissensräumen: Optionen des Zugangs zu Information und Bildung (De Gruyter Saur, Berlin; Boston, 2014) · DOI
  8. J. Erpenbeck, W. Sauter, So werden wir lernen! Kompetenzentwicklung in einer Welt fühlender Computer, kluger Wolken und sinnsuchender Netze (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013) · DOI
  9. J. Erpenbeck, W. Sauter, Kompetenzentwicklung mit humanoiden Computern. Die Revolution des Lernens via Cloud Computing und semantischen Netzen (Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, 2015) · DOI
  10. D. Estrin, D. Culler, K. Pister, G. Sukhatme, Connecting the physical world with pervasive networks. IEEE Pervasive Computing 1(1), 59–69 (2002) · DOI
  11. J. Gómez, J.F. Huete, O. Hoyos, L. Perez, & D. Grigori, Interaction System based on Internet of Things as Support for Education. Procedia Computer Science, 21, 132–139 (2013). Accessed 19 Nov. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.019 . · DOI
  12. B. Gros, The design of smart educational environments. Smart Learning Environments 3(1) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0039-x · DOI
  13. G.-J. Hwang, Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments - a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments 1(1) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0004-5 · DOI · Paper page
  14. S. Kanagarajan, S. Ramakrishnan, Ubiquitous and ambient intelligence assisted learning environment infrastructures development - a review. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9618-x · DOI
  15. M. Kerres. E-Learning vs. Digitalisierung der Bildung: Neues Label oder neues Paradigma? In: A. Hohenstein, & K. Wilbers (Hrsg.) Handbuch E-Learning, Köln: Fachverlag Deutscher Wirtschaftsdienst, Ergänzungslieferung, ISBN 978-3-87156-298-3, 61 (2016)
  16. J.H. Knoll, Architektur und Erwachsenenbildung, in Internationales Jahrbuch der Erwachsenenbildung 23, (Böhlau, Köln, 1995) · DOI
  17. C. Kohls, G. Münster, in Bildungsräume 2017 (S. 39–50), ed. by C. Igel, C. Ullrich, W. Martin. Hybride Lernräume für Innovationsprozesse (Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn, 2017)
  18. R. Koper, Conditions for effective smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments 1(1), 1–17 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  19. C.-U. Lei, K. Wan, K.L. Man, Developing a smart learning environment in universities via cyber-physical systems. Procedia Computer Science 17, 583–585 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.075 · DOI
  20. U. Lucke, C. Rensing, A survey on pervasive education. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 14, 3–16 (2014) · DOI
  21. F. Mattern, E. Fleisch, Das Internet der Dinge. Ubiquitous Computing und RFID in der Praxis: Visionen, Technologien, Anwendungen, Handlungsanleitungen. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2005) · DOI
  22. P. Mayring, Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Handbuch qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie, 601–613Sesink, W. (2007). Raum und Lernen. Education Permanente. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Weiterbildung 41(1), 16–18 (2010) · DOI · Paper page
  23. J.M. Spector, Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments 1(1), 1–10 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
  24. W. Sesink, Raum und Lernen. Education Permanente. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Weiterbildung, 41(1), 16–18 (2007).
  25. H. Stachowiak, Allgemeine Modelltheorie. (Springer-Verlag, Wien, New York, 1973) · DOI
  26. A. Uzelac, N. Gligoric, S. Krco, A comprehensive study of parameters in physical environment that impact students’ focus during lecture using internet of things. Comput. Hum. Behav. 53, 427–434 (2015) · DOI
  27. O. Vermesan, Friess, P. Building the Hyperconnected Society - Internet of Things Research and Innovation Value Chains, Ecosystems and Markets. (River Publishers, Aalborg, 2015)
  28. M. Weiser, The computer for the 21 st century. Sci. Am. 265(3), 94–105 (1991) · DOI · Paper page
  29. T. Winkler, F. Scharf, M. Herczeg, Ambiente Lernräume: Lernen mit vernetzten, interaktiven, körper- und raumbezogenen Medien. Informatik-Spektrum 37(5), 445–448 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-014-0817-1 · DOI
  30. Z.-T. Zhu, M.-H. Yu, P. Riezebos, A research framework of smart education. Smart Learning Environments 3(1) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0026-2 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Freigang, S., Schlenker, L., & Köhler, T.
Affiliations
Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Corresponding author
Freigang, Sirkka
Venue
Smart Learning Environments
Published
2018-10-24
Volume
5
Issue
1
ISSN
2196-7091 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898362519
Cited by
52
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5
FWCI
16.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Smart Learning Environments (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Learning Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Engineering Education and Technology
Keywords
Internet of Things, design framework, interdisciplinary design, socio-technical framework, success factors, educational technology, design model validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A conceptual framework for designing smart learning environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40561-018-0076-8
The paper
Freigang, S., Schlenker, L., & Köhler, T. (2018). A conceptual framework for designing smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0076-8