The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient gene editing in Neurospora crassa with CRISPR technology
Open accessAbstract
Efficient gene editing is a critical tool for investigating molecular mechanisms of cellular processes and engineering organisms for numerous purposes ranging from biotechnology to medicine. Recently developed RNA-guided CRISPR/Cas9 technology has been used for efficient gene editing in various organisms, but has not been tested in a model filamentous fungus, Neurospora crassa . In this report, we demonstrate efficient gene replacement in a model filamentous fungus, Neurospora crassa , with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. We utilize Cas9 endonuclease and single crRNA:tracrRNA chimeric guide RNA (gRNA) to: (1) replace the endogenous promoter of clr - 2 with the β - tubulin promoter, and (2) introduce a codon optimized fire fly luciferase under the control of the gsy - 1 promoter at the csr - 1 locus. CLR-2 is one of the core transcription factors that regulate the expression of cellulases, and GSY-1 regulates the conversion of glucose into glycogen. We show that the β - tubulin promoter driven clr - 2 strain shows increased expression of cellulases, and gsy - 1 - luciferase reporter strain can be easily screened with a bioluminescence assay. CRISPR/Cas9 system works efficiently in Neurospora crassa , which may be adapted to Neurospora natural isolates and other filamentous fungi. It will be beneficial for the filamentous fungal research community to take advantage of CRISPR/Cas9 tool kits that enable genetic perturbations including gene replacement and insertions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210
CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes
Sander, J. D., & Joung, J. K. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2842 · Cited by 3,153 · cited 1×
“CRISPR/Cas9 system has been utilized for gene editing ranging from yeast to human cells including filamentous fungi [5–8].”
Background
Cited by
Microbial Pigments in the Food Industry—Challenges and the Way Forward
Sen, T., Barrow, C. J., & Deshmukh, S. K. (2019) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2019.00007 · Cited by 367
Shen, Q., Ruan, H., Zhang, H., Wu, T., Zhu, K., Han, W., Dong, R., Ming, T., Qi, H., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1375120 · Cited by 38
Pepe, M., Hesami, M., de la Cerda, K. A., Perreault, M. L., Hsiang, T., & Jones, A. M. P. (2023) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108247 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Matsu-ura, T., Baek, M., Kwon, J., & Hong, C.
- Venue
- Fungal Biology and Biotechnology
- Published
- 2015-07-15
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-4
- ISSN
- 2054-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1888035769
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient gene editing in Neurospora crassa with CRISPR technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40694-015-0015-1
- The paper
- Matsu-ura, T., Baek, M., Kwon, J., & Hong, C. (2015). Efficient gene editing in Neurospora crassa with CRISPR technology. Fungal Biology and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40694-015-0015-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.