Feasibility and acceptability of a televideo physical activity and nutrition program for recent kidney transplant recipients
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Post-transplant weight gain affects 50-90% of kidney transplant recipients adversely affecting survival, quality of life, and risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Diet modification and physical activity may help prevent post-transplant weight gain. Methods for effective implementation of these lifestyle modifications are needed. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a remotely delivered nutrition and physical activity intervention among kidney transplant recipients. Secondary aims were to estimate the effectiveness of the intervention in producing changes in physical activity, qualify of life, fruit and vegetable intake, and consumption of whole grains and water from baseline to 6 months. METHODS: A randomized controlled study for stable kidney transplant recipients between 6 and 12 months post-transplantation was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to a technology-based, lifestyle modification program (intervention) or to enhanced usual care (control). RESULTS: The first 10 kidney transplant recipients screened were eligible and randomized into the intervention and control groups with no significant between-group differences at baseline. Health coaching attendance (78%) and adherence to reporting healthy behaviors (86%) were high. All participants returned for final assessments. The weight in controls remained stable, while the intervention arm showed weight gain at 3 and 6 months. Improvements were found for physical activity, quality of life, and fruit and vegetable intake in both groups. All participants would recommend the program to other transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a remotely delivered televideo nutrition and physical activity intervention is feasible and valued by patients. These findings will aid in the development of a larger, more prescriptive, randomized trial to address weight gain prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT03697317. Retrospectively registered on October 5, 2018.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most RCTs aiming at preventing weight gain early after KTx did not demonstrate any advantage of either nutritional or physical activity-based interventions over standard care.
“Most RCTs aiming at preventing weight gain early after KTx did not demonstrate any advantage of either nutritional or physical activity-based interventions over standard care (24, 25).”
From Cognitive-behavioral and dietary weight loss intervention in adult kidney transplant recipients with overweight and obesity: Results of a pilot RCT study (Adi-KTx) (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
The Discussion reports that one randomized nutrition-and-exercise study showed no advantage over standard care and that an exercise program alone did not prevent weight gain in the first post-transplant year. It also says randomized-trial data are limited; it does not establish that most RCTs found no advantage or separately substantiate that conclusion for nutritional and physical-activity interventions. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn Gibson et al.'s feasibility study, treatment adherence was high but the intervention group had somewhat more weight gain than the control group.
“Even though treatment adherence was high, the authors reported somewhat more weight gain in the intervention group compared to the control group.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 24
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [21]Bandura A Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory 1986 Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall
- Authors
- Gibson, C. A., Gupta, A., Greene, J. L., Lee, J., Mount, R. R., & Sullivan, D. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
- University of Kansas (US)
- Texas Tech University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gibson, Cheryl A.
- Venue
- Pilot and Feasibility Studies
- Published
- 2020-09-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 126-126
- ISSN
- 2055-5784 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7488333
- OpenAlex
- W3086558591
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Pilot and Feasibility Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- KU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ThinkTech (Texas Tech University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
- Keywords
- kidney transplant recipients, post-transplant weight gain, physical activity, nutrition interventions, feasibility and acceptability, health coaching, quality of life, fruit and vegetable intake, whole grains, water intake
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review