Multi-view large population gait dataset and its performance evaluation for cross-view gait recognition
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes the world’s largest gait database with wide view variation, the “OU-ISIR gait database, multi-view large population dataset (OU-MVLP)”, and its application to a statistically reliable performance evaluation of vision-based cross-view gait recognition. Specifically, we construct a gait dataset that includes 10,307 subjects (5114 males and 5193 females) from 14 view angles ranging 0° −90°, 180° −270°. In addition, we evaluate various approaches to gait recognition which are robust against view angles. By using our dataset, we can fully exploit a state-of-the-art method requiring a large number of training samples, e.g., CNN-based cross-view gait recognition method, and we validate effectiveness of such a family of the methods.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DiGGAN obtained state-of-the-art results over the largest multiview gait dataset (OU-MVLP, >10,000 people) using cross-view approaches.
“An example of the approach can be observed in the UK's Newcastle University cross-view gait recognition system, the so-called DiGGAN, which obtained state-of-the-art results over the largest multiview gait dataset in the world [99] (comprising more than 10 , 000 people) using cross-view approaches [35].”
From Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [99]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Large-Scale Video Classification with Convolutional Neural Networks
Karpathy, A., Toderici, G., Shetty, S., Leung, T., Sukthankar, R., & Fei-Fei, L. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.223 · Cited by 6,354 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, the effectiveness of a CNN has been demonstrated in research fields that are more relevant with gait recognition, such as action recognition [14], video classification [15], and face recognition [16].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Bouchrika I, Goffredo M, Carter J, Nixon M (2011) On using gait in forensic biometrics. J Forensic Sci 56(4):882-889
- Lynnerup N, Larsen PK (2014) Gait as evidence. IET Biom 3(2):47-54.
- Kale A, Roy-Chowdhury A, Chellappa R (2003) Towards a view invariant gait recognition algorithm. In: Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance. IEEE, Miami. pp 143-150
- Makihara Y, Sagawa R, Mukaigawa Y, Echigo T, Yagi Y (2006) Gait recognition using a view transformation model in the frequency domain. In: Proc. of the 9th European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp 151-163
- Kusakunniran W, Wu Q, Zhang J, Li H (2012) Gait recognition under various viewing angles based on correlated motion regression. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 22(6):966-980
- Goffredo M, Bouchrika I, Carter JN, Nixon MS (2010) Self-calibrating view-invariant gait biometrics. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 40(4):997-1008
- Han J, Bhanu B (2006) Individual recognition using gait energy image. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28(2):316-322
- Bashir K, Xiang T, Gong S (2010) Gait recognition without subject cooperation. Pattern Recogn Lett 31(13):2052-2060
- Martin-Felez R, Xiang T (2014) Uncooperative gait recognition by learning to rank. Pattern Recognit 47(12):3793-3806
- Mansur A, Makihara Y, Muramatsu D, Yagi Y (2014) Cross-view gait recognition using view-dependent discriminative analysis. In: The 2nd IEEE Int. Joint Conf. on Biometrics (IJCB 2014). IEEE, Clearwater. pp 1-8
- Hinton GE, Osindero S, Teh Y-W (2006) A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput 18(7):1527-1554
- Ji S, Xu W, Yang M, Yu K (2013) 3d convolutional neural networks for human action recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 35(1):221-231
- Taigman Y, Yang M, Ranzato M, Wolf L (2014) Deepface: closing the gap to human-level performance in face verification. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2014 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, Columbus. pp 1701-1708
- Wu Z, Huang Y, Wang L, Tan T (2016) A comprehensive study on cross-view gait based human identification with deep cnns. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1(1):1-10
- Wu Z, Huang Y, Wang L (2015) Learning representative deep features for image set analysis. IEEE Trans Multimed 17(11):1960-1968
- Shiraga K, Makihara Y, Muramatsu D, Echigo T, Yagi Y (2016) Geinet: View-invariant gait recognition using a convolutional neural network. In: Proc. of the 9th IAPR International Conference on Biometrics. IEEE, Halmstad. pp 1-8
- Yu S, Tan D, Tan T (2006) A framework for evaluating the effect of view angle, clothing and carrying condition on gait recognition. In: Proc. of the 18th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, vol 4. IEEE, Hong Kong. pp 441-444
- Iwama H, Okumura M, Makihara Y, Yagi Y (2012) The ou-isir gait database comprising the large population dataset and performance evaluation of gait recognition. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 7(5):1511-1521
- Samangooei S, Bustard J, Seely R, Nixon M, Carter J (2011) On acquisition and analysis of a dataset comprising of gait, ear and semantic data. In: Multibiometrics for Human Identification. CUP. pp 277-301. Chapter 12
- Gross R, Shi J (2001) The cmu motion of body (mobo) database. Technical report, CMT 25. López-Fernández D, Madrid-Cuevas FJ, Carmona-Poyato Á, Marín-Jiménez MJ, Mu ṅoz-Salinas R (2014) The AVA Multi-View Dataset for Gait Recognition. Springer International Publishing, Cham
- DeCann B, Ross A, Dawson J (2013) Investigating gait recognition in the short-wave infrared (swir) spectrum: Dataset and challenges. In: Proc. of SPIE Conference on Biometric Technology for Human Identification X. SPIE Press, Baltimore. pp 1-16
- Iwashita Y, Baba R, Ogawara K, Kurazume R (2010) Person identification from spatio-temporal 3d gait. In: 2010 International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies. IEEE, Canterbury. pp 30-35
- Seely RD, Samangooei S, Lee M, Carter JN, Nixon MS (2008) The university of southampton multi-biometric tunnel and introducing a novel 3d gait dataset. In: Proc. of IEEE Second International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems. IEEE, Arlington. pp 1-6
- Makihara Y, Kimura T, Okura F, Mitsugami I, Niwa M, Aoki C, Suzuki A, Muramatsu D, Echigo T, Yagi Y (2016) Gait collector: an automatic gait data collection system in conjunction with an experience-based long-run exhibition. In: Proc. of the 9th IAPR International Conference on Biometrics. IEEE, Halmstad. pp 1-8
- Liu Z, Sarkar S (2004) Simplest representation yet for gait recognition: averaged silhouette. In: Proc. of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE, Cambridge Vol. 1. pp 211-214
- Kusakunniran W, Wu Q, Li H, Zhang J (2009) Multiple views gait recognition using view transformation model based on optimized gait energy image. In: Proc. of the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Tracking Humans for the Evaluation of their Motion in Image Sequences. pp 1058-1064
- Muramatsu D, Makihara Y, Yagi Y (2016) View transformation model incorporating quality measures for cross-view gait recognition. IEEE Trans Cybern PP(99):1-1
- Otsu N (1982) Optimal linear and nonlinear solutions for least-square discriminant feature extraction. In: Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition. IEEE, Munich. pp 557-560
- Belhumeur PN, Hespanha JP, Kriegman DJ (1997) Eigenfaces vs. fisherfaces: recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 19(7):711-720
- Chopra S, Hadsell R, Lecun Y (2005) Learning a similarity metric discriminatively, with application to face verification. In: Proc. of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, SanDiego. pp 539-546
- Zhang C, Liu W, Ma H, Fu H (2016) Siamese neural network based gait recognition for human identification. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, Shanghai. pp 2832-2836
- Makihara Y, Sagawa R, Mukaigawa Y, Echigo T, Yagi Y (2006) Which reference view is effective for gait identification using a view transformation model?. In: Proc. of the IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Biometrics 2006, New York
- Doddington G, Liggett W, Martin A, Przybocki M, Reynolds D (1998) Sheep, goats, lambs and wolves a statistical analysis of speaker performance in the nist 1998 speaker recognition evaluation. In: Proc. of International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ASSTA, Sydney
- Wang C, Zhang J, Wang L, Pu J, Yuan X (2012) Human identification using temporal information preserving gait template. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34(11):2164-2176
- Sagawa R, Makihara Y, Echigo T, Yagi Y (2006) Matching gait image sequences in the frequency domain for tracking people at a distance. In: Proc. of the 7th Asian Conf. on Computer Vision, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp 141-150
- Wang L, Ning H, Hu W, Tan T (2002) Gait recognition based on procrustes shape analysis. In: Proceedings. 2002 International Conference on Image Processing, vol 3. IEEE, Rochester. pp 433-436
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey
Filipi Gonçalves dos Santos, C., Oliveira, D. D. S., A. Passos, L., Gonçalves Pires, R., Felipe Silva Santos, D., Pascotti Valem, L., P. Moreira, T., Cleison S. Santana, M., Roder, M., Paulo Papa, J., et al. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3490235 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Robust Cross-View Gait Recognition with Evidence: A Discriminant Gait GAN (DiGGAN) Approach
Hu, B., Guan, Y., Gao, Y., Long, Y., Lane, N., & Ploetz, T. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.10493 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Takemura, N., Makihara, Y., Muramatsu, D., Echigo, T., & Yagi, Y.
- Affiliations
- The University of Osaka (JP)
- Osaka Electro-Communication University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Takemura, Noriko
- Venue
- IPSJ Transactions on Computer Vision and Applications
- Published
- 2018-02-20
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1882-6695 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2788751553
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 10.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- IPSJ Transactions on Computer Vision and Applications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP15H01693)
- Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (Behavior Understanding based on Intention-Gait Model)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Keywords
- gait recognition, cross-view gait recognition, performance evaluation, biometrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review