Detecting morphed passport photos: a training and individual differences approach
Open accessAbstract
Our reliance on face photos for identity verification is at odds with extensive research which shows that matching pairs of unfamiliar faces is highly prone to error. This process can therefore be exploited by identity fraudsters seeking to deceive ID checkers (e.g., using a stolen passport which contains an image of a similar looking individual to deceive border control officials). In this study we build on previous work which sought to quantify the threat posed by a relatively new type of fraud: morphed passport photos. Participants were initially unaware of the presence of morphs in a series of face photo arrays and were simply asked to detect which images they thought had been digitally manipulated (i.e., “images that didn’t look quite right”). All participants then received basic information on morph fraud and rudimentary guidance on how to detect such images, followed by a morph detection training task (Training Group, n = 40), or a non-face control task (Guidance Group, n = 40). Participants also completed a post-guidance/training morph detection task and the Models Face Matching Test (MFMT). Our findings show that baseline morph detection rates were poor, that morph detection training significantly improved the identification of these images over and above basic guidance, and that accuracy in the mismatch condition of the MFMT correlated with morph detection ability. The results are discussed in relation to potential countermeasures for morph-based identity fraud.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Almost all video/image stimuli used face swapping or lip-sync technique, except for three studies that used morphing techniques.
“Almost all video/image stimuli used face swapping or lip-sync technique, except for three studies that used morphing techniques [6, 7, 18].”
From Human Performance in Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
None of the experimental studies had any follow-up, and only two studies had pre-post measurements of the outcome.
“However, none of the experimental studies had any followup, and only two studies had pre -post measurements of the outcome [6, 18].”
From Human Performance in Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
Robertson et al.'s study, which involved an additional element of training whereby feedback was provided after each trial, resulted in improved detection performance.
“In contrast, Robertson et al. ' s [18] study involved an additional element of training whereby feedback was provided to participants after each trial, which resulted in improved detection performance.”
From Human Performance in Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
Interactive training activities in which feedback and/or example videos are provided appear to bolster detection performance.
“Interactive training activities in which feedback and/or example videos are provided also appear to bolster detection performance [18, 37].”
From Human Performance in Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Bobak AK Hancock PJ Bate S Super-recognisers in action: Evidence from face-matching and face memory tasks Applied Cognitive Psychology 2016 30 1 81 91 10.1002/acp.3170 PMC6084338 30122803 · DOI
- Bruce V Henderson Z Greenwood K Hancock PJ Burton AM Miller P Verification of face identities from images captured on video Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 1999 5 4 339
- Burton AM Why has research in face recognition progressed so slowly? The importance of variability Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2013 66 8 1467 1485 10.1080/17470218.2013.800125 23742022 · DOI
- Burton AM White D McNeill A The Glasgow Face Matching Test Behavior Research Methods 2010 42 1 286 291 10.3758/BRM.42.1.286 20160307 · DOI
- Davis JP Lander K Evans R Jansari A Investigating predictors of superior face recognition ability in police super-recognisers Applied Cognitive Psychology 2016 30 6 827 840 10.1002/acp.3260 · DOI
- Davis JP Valentine T CCTV on trial: Matching video images with the defendant in the dock Applied Cognitive Psychology 2009 23 4 482 505 10.1002/acp.1490 · DOI
- Dennett HW McKone E Edwards M Susilo T Face aftereffects predict individual differences in face recognition ability Psychological Science 2012 23 11 1279 1287 10.1177/0956797612446350 23073026 · DOI
- Dowsett AJ Burton AM Unfamiliar face matching: Pairs out-perform individuals and provide a route to training British Journal of Psychology 2015 106 3 433 445 10.1111/bjop.12103 25393594 · DOI
- Ferrara M Franco A Maltoni D Bourlai T On the effects of image alterations on face recognition accuracy Face recognition across the imaging Spectrum 2016 Cham Springer 195 222
- Furl N Garrido L Dolan RJ Driver J Duchaine B Fusiform gyrus face selectivity relates to individual differences in facial recognition ability Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011 23 7 1723 1740 10.1162/jocn.2010.21545 20617881 PMC3322334 · DOI
- Jenkins R White D Van Montfort X Burton AM Variability in photos of the same face Cognition 2011 121 3 313 323 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.001 21890124 · DOI
- Kemp R Towell N Pike G When seeing should not be believing: Photographs, credit cards and fraud Applied Cognitive Psychology 1997 11 3 211 222 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199706)11:3<211::AID-ACP430>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
- Makrushin A Neubert T Dittmann J Automatic generation and detection of visually faultless facial morphs Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (VISIGRAPP 2017) 2017 39 50
- Megreya AM Burton AM Hits and false positives in face matching: A familiarity-based dissociation Perception & psychophysics 2007 69 7 1175 1184 10.3758/BF03193954 18038955 · DOI
- Middleton, R. (2014). For terrorists, documents are as important as weapons. CSEye. Journal of the UK Forensic Science Society,1(2), 6–10.
- Nightingale SJ Wade KA Watson DG Can people identify original and manipulated photos of real-world scenes? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 2017 2 1 30 28776002 PMC5514174
- Robertson DJ Burton AM Unfamiliar face recognition: Security, surveillance and smartphones Journal of the U.S. Homeland Defense and Security Information Analysis Center 2016 3 1 14 21
- Robertson DJ Kramer RSS Burton AM Fraudulent ID using face morphs: Experiments on human and automatic recognition PLoS ONE 2017 12 3 e0173319 10.1371/journal.pone.0173319 28328928 PMC5362102 · DOI
- Robertson DJ Middleton R Burton AM From policing to passport guidance: The limitations of photo ID Keesing Journal of Documents and Identity 2015 46 3 8
- Robertson DJ Noyes E Dowsett AJ Jenkins R Burton AM Face recognition by metropolitan police super-recognisers PLoS ONE 2016 11 2 e0150036 10.1371/journal.pone.0150036 26918457 PMC4769018 · DOI
- Sanders JG Ueda Y Minemoto K Noyes E Yoshikawa S Jenkins R Hyper-realistic face masks: A new challenge in person identification Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 2017 2 1 43 29104914 PMC5655619
- White D Kemp RI Jenkins R Burton AM Feedback training for facial image comparison Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2014 21 1 100 106 10.3758/s13423-013-0475-3 23835616 · DOI
- White D Kemp RI Jenkins R Matheson M Burton AM Passport officers’ errors in face matching PLoS ONE 2014 9 8 e103510 10.1371/journal.pone.0103510 25133682 PMC4136722 · DOI
- Wilmer JB Germine L Chabris CF Chatterjee G Williams M Loken E Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010 107 11 5238 5241 10.1073/pnas.0913053107 PMC2841913 20176944 · DOI
- Young AW Burton AM Recognizing faces Current Directions in Psychological Science 2017 26 3 212 217 10.1177/0963721416688114 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deepfakes and scientific knowledge dissemination
Doss, C., Mondschein, J., Shu, D., Wolfson, T., Kopecky, D., Fitton-Kane, V. A., Bush, L., & Tucker, C. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-39944-3 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Human performance in detecting deepfakes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 56 papers
Diel, A., Lalgi, T., Schröter, I. C., MacDorman, K. F., Teufel, M., & Bäuerle, A. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100538 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Face morphing attacks: Investigating detection with humans and computers
Kramer, R. S. S., Mireku, M. O., Flack, T. R., & Ritchie, K. L. (2019) · Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-019-0181-4 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Human Performance in Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Review
Somoray, K., Miller, D. J., & Holmes, M. (2025) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/1833228 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Psychophysical Evaluation of Human Performance in Detecting Digital Face Image Manipulations
Nichols, R., Rathgeb, C., Drozdowski, P., & Busch, C. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3160596 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Robertson, D. J., Mungall, A., Watson, D. G., Wade, K. A., Nightingale, S. J., & Butler, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Strathclyde (GB)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Robertson, David J.
- Venue
- Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
- Published
- 2018-06-27
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-27
- ISSN
- 2365-7464 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6028877
- OpenAlex
- W2810132135
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cognitive Research Principles and Implications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Strathclyde
- University of Stirling
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Keywords
- identity fraud, face recognition (cognition), face matching, individual differences, image editing, border control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review