University students' self-regulated learning using digital technologies
Open accessAbstract
Analysing the process by which students—whether at university or not—manage and facilitate their own learning has been a recurrent educational research problem. Recently, the question arises about how the development of strategies taking place during the aforementioned process could be made easier by using technologies. In an effort to know whether university students really use digital technologies to plan, organize and facilitate their own learning, we have proposed three research questions. Which technologies do university students use to self-regulate their learning? What self-regulated learning strategies do they develop using technologies? What profiles could be identified among students based on their use of self-regulation strategies with technology? To answer these questions, the “Survey of Self-regulated Learning with Technology at the University” was designed. Information from a sample group with 711 students from various universities located in the region of Andalusia (Spain) was collected with this survey. The results indicate that university students, even when they are frequent users of digital technology, they tend not to use these technologies to regulate their own learning process. Of all technologies analysed, Internet information search and instant communication tools are used continually. In turn, the most generalised self-regulation learning strategies are those relative to social support. Nevertheless, students differ from each other regarding their use and frequency. There are groups of students who make use of self-regulation strategies when learning with technologies. In this regard, two distinctive groups of students have been identified, who show differentiated self-regulated levels.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Learning is not self-regulated despite its importance in achievement for university students.
“(2) learning is not self-regulated despite its importance in achievement for university students (Cheng et al., 2013; Yot-Domínguez and Carlos, 2017).”
From Using version control to document genuine effort in written assignments: a protocol with examples for universities (2023) · cites this paper as Yot-Domínguez and Carlos, 2017
Cites
A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students
Pintrich, P. R. (2004) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x · Cited by 3,269 · see citing works
Handbook of Metacognition in Education
Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2009) · doi:10.4324/9780203876428 · Cited by 1,509 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tseng, Y.-C., & Lin, Y.-H. (2024) · Electronic Journal of e-Learning · doi:10.34190/ejel.21.5.3329 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Mohammadi, R. R., Saeidi, M., & Abdollahi, A. (2023) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2023.103120 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Yilmaz, M., Gauthier, A., & Cukurova, M. (2026) · Educational technology research and development · doi:10.1007/s11423-026-10595-1 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Orbán, L. L. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1169938 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yot-Domínguez, C., & Marcelo, C.
- ORCID
- Marcelo, Carlos
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
- Published
- 2017-11-17
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2365-9440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2767848305
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 19.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Consejería de Economía, Innovación, Ciencia y Empleo, Junta de Andalucía (P10-HUM-6677)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Innovation
- Keywords
- student self-regulation, university students, digital technologies, self-regulation strategies, social support, information search, student profile, higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review