Use of interval-censored survival data as an alternative to Kaplan-Meier survival curves: studies of oral lesion occurrence in liver transplants and cancer recurrence
Open accessAbstract
After undergoing liver transplantation, children are susceptible to oral lesions due to immunosuppressant drugs that are needed to maintain the transplant. In this context, it is important to understand how disease characteristics and age at transplantation influence the development of these lesions. Monitoring of lesions begins after transplantation and children are usually observed by a specialist in stomatology at periodic visits. Consequently, lesion development is estimated to occur between two observed times, and this is characterized as interval-censored data. However, in clinical practice, it is common to assume the moment of observation as the time of event occurrence, thereby excluding interval-censored data. Here, we discuss the impact of excluding interval-censored mechanisms in statistical analyses by using simulation studies to consider differences in sample sizes and amplitudes between observed intervals. Then, application studies are presented which use a data set from a prospective study that was conducted to investigate oral lesions in patients after liver transplantation at the A.C.Camargo Cancer Center in Brazil between 2013 and 2016 and a data set involving recurrent ovarian cancer in patients diagnosed with high-grade serous carcinoma at the A.C.Camargo Cancer Center between 2003 and 2016.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Methods to deal with interval-censored data have been developed in a survival data context and use survival data terminology.
“Methods to deal with interval-censored data have been developed in a survival data context and use survival data terminology [71].”
From Glycaemic thresholds for counterregulatory hormone and symptom responses to hypoglycaemia in people with and without type 1 diabetes: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [71]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Verhulst, C. E. M., Fabricius, T. W., Teerenstra, S., Kristensen, P. L., Tack, C. J., McCrimmon, R. J., Heller, S., Evans, M. L., Amiel, S. A., Pedersen-Bjergaard, U., et al. (2022) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-022-05749-8 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rodrigues, A. S., Calsavara, V. F., Silva, F. I. B., Alves, F. A., & Vivas, A. P. M.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- AC Camargo Hospital (BR)
- Venue
- Applied Cancer Research
- Published
- 2018-11-26
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1808-5512 (ISSN-L)
- 1980-5578
- OpenAlex
- W2903441929
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied cancer research/Applied Cancer Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Keywords
- interval-censored survival data, Kaplan-Meier curves, oral lesions, liver transplantation, immunosuppressants, tumor recurrence, recurrent ovarian cancer, high-grade serous carcinoma, children, age at transplantation, survival analysis, simulation study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review