Hydrogen cyanamide poisoning: multiple microscopic analyses evidence of forensic entomotoxicology succession on decomposing covered/uncovered rat carrions
Open accessAbstract
Background: Forensic entomotoxicology is a crucial field that studies the effects of drugs and poisons on carrion-feeding insects, particularly in crime investigations. Hydrogen cyanamide, a plant growth regulator, is hazardous and used in agriculture but is limited in some countries due to its high cost and severe toxicity. The terrestrial isopod Porcellio laevis plays a vital role in soil ecosystems and biosystem management. Accordingly, authors aimed to examine the impact of hydrogen cyanamide toxicity on arthropods, specifically Porcellio laevis, Musca domestica (House flies), and Sarcophaga sp. (Flesh flies) visiting decomposing covered/uncovered rat carrions, which could be relevant in forensic investigations. A total of 20 rats were divided into two control (I and II, covered/uncovered) and two treated groups (III and IV, covered/uncovered, euthanized using hydrogen cyanamide). Arthropods were gathered bi-daily during the initial week and then once daily for a duration of 1 month and were assessed for growth rate. Morphological and histological alterations were analyzed using light and electron microscopes. Results: The results revealed that hydrogen cyanamide caused a delay in postmortem interval (PMI) by 22–33 h in certain insect species, particularly in uncovered carrion. Severe damage was observed in the carrions of Groups III and IV, specifically Porcellio laevis. Conclusion: A scanning electron microscope (SEM) would be beneficial for scrutinizing insects as postmortem toxicological specimens.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Bouchon, D., Zimmer, M., & Dittmer, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01472 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Abd El-Aziz, F. E.-Z. A., Abdel-Malek, A. R., Mohammed, M. K., Eldeen, M. A., & Ebrahem, N. E.
- Affiliations
- Assiut University (EG)
- Zagazig University (EG)
- Venue
- Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Published
- 2025-04-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2090-536X (ISSN-L)
- 2090-5939
- OpenAlex
- W4409150238
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Historical and Scientific Studies
- Keywords
- carrion decomposition, Porcellio laevis, Musca domestica, Sarcophaga, insect growth rate, postmortem interval, insect morphology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review