Cited by 226Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchScience Education and PedagogyProblem and Project Based Learning

The Genomics Education Partnership: Successful Integration of Research into Laboratory Classes at a Diverse Group of Undergraduate Institutions

Open access
Shaffer, Christopher D., Alvarez, Consuelo, Bailey, Cheryl, Barnard, Daron, Bhalla, Satish, Chandrasekaran, Chitra, Chandrasekaran, Vidya, Chung, Hui-Min +45 more·2010·CBE—Life Sciences Education

Abstract

Genomics is not only essential for students to understand biology but also provides unprecedented opportunities for undergraduate research. The goal of the Genomics Education Partnership (GEP), a collaboration between a growing number of colleges and universities around the country and the Department of Biology and Genome Center of Washington University in St. Louis, is to provide such research opportunities. Using a versatile curriculum that has been adapted to many different class settings, GEP undergraduates undertake projects to bring draft-quality genomic sequence up to high quality and/or participate in the annotation of these sequences. GEP undergraduates have improved more than 2 million bases of draft genomic sequence from several species of Drosophila and have produced hundreds of gene models using evidence-based manual annotation. Students appreciate their ability to make a contribution to ongoing research, and report increased independence and a more active learning approach after participation in GEP projects. They show knowledge gains on pre- and postcourse quizzes about genes and genomes and in bioinformatic analysis. Participating faculty also report professional gains, increased access to genomics-related technology, and an overall positive experience. We have found that using a genomics research project as the core of a laboratory course is rewarding for both faculty and students.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1187/09-11-0087

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 226

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Campbell A. M. Eckdahl T. T. Fowlks E. Heyer L. J. Hoopes L.L.M. Ledbetter M. L. Rosenwald A. G. Genome Consortium for Active Teaching (GCAT) Science 2006 311 1103 1104 16497918
  2. Campbell A. M. Ledbetter M. L. Hoopes L. L. Eckdahl T. T. Heyer L. J. Rosenwald A. Fowlks E. Tonidandel S. Bucholtz B. Gottfried G. Genome Consortium for Active Teaching: meeting the goals of BIO2010 CBE Life Sci. Educ 2007 2 109 118 17548873 PMC1885901
  3. Clark A. G. Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny Nature 2007 450 203 218 17994087
  4. Goodner B. W. Genome sequence of the plant pathogen and biotechnology agent Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 Science 2001 294 2323 2328 11743194
  5. Gordon D. Viewing and editing assembled sequences using Consed Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 2003 Unit 11.2 18428695
  6. Gordon D. Abajian C. Green P. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing Genome Res 1998 3 195 202 9521923
  7. Hacisalihoglu G. Hilgert U. Nash E. B. Micklos D. A. An innovative plant genomics and gene annotation program for high school, community college, and university faculty CBE Life Sci. Educ 2008 3 310 316 18765753 PMC2527984
  8. Hatfull G. F. Exploring the mycobacteriophage metaproteome: phage genomics as an educational platform PLoS Genet 2006 6 e92 16789831 PMC1475703
  9. Karolchik D. The UCSC Genome Browser Database: 2008 update Nucleic Acids Res 2008 Database issue D773-9 18086701 PMC2238835
  10. Kerfeld C. A. Simons R. W. The undergraduate genomics research initiative PloS Biol 2007 5 980 983 PMC1868073 17503966
  11. Locks A. M. Gregerman S. R. Taraban R. Blanton R. L. Undergraduate research as an institutional retention strategy: The University of Michigan model Creating Effective Undergraduate Research Programs in Science 2008 New York Teachers College Press 11 32
  12. Lopatto D. Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): first findings Cell Biol. Educ 2004 4 270 277 15592600 PMC533131
  13. Lopatto D. Taraban R. Blanton R. L. Exploring the benefits of undergraduate research: The SURE survey Creating Effective Undergraduate Research Programs in Science 2008 New York Teachers College Press 112 132
  14. Lopatto D. Undergraduate research: genomics education partnership Science 2008 322 684 685 18974335 PMC2953277
  15. National Research Council Bio 2010, transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists 2003 Washington DC National Academies Press 20669482
  16. Pettersson E. Lundeberg J. Ahmadian A. Generations of sequencing technologies Genomics 2009 2 105 111 18992322
  17. Slawson E. E. Comparison of dot chromosome sequences from D. melanogaster and D. virilis reveals an enrichment of DNA transposon sequences in heterochromatic domains Genome Biol 2006 2 R15 16507169 PMC1431729

Authors
Shaffer, C. D., Alvarez, C., Bailey, C., Barnard, D., Bhalla, S., Chandrasekaran, C., Chandrasekaran, V., Chung, H.-M., Dorer, D. R., Du, C., Eckdahl, T. T., Poet, J. L., Frohlich, D., Goodman, A. L., Gosser, Y., Hauser, C., Hoopes, L. L. M., Johnson, D., Jones, C. J., Kaehler, M., Kokan, N., Kopp, O. R., Kuleck, G. A., McNeil, G., Moss, R., Myka, J. L., Nagengast, A., Morris, R., Overvoorde, P. J., Shoop, E., Parrish, S., Reed, K., Regisford, E. G., Revie, D., Rosenwald, A. G., Saville, K., Schroeder, S., Shaw, M., Skuse, G., Smith, C., Smith, M., Spana, E. P., Spratt, M., Stamm, J., Thompson, J. S., Wawersik, M., Wilson, B. A., Youngblom, J., Leung, W., Buhler, J., Mardis, E. R., Lopatto, D., & Elgin, S. C. R.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Longwood University (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • Worcester State University (US)
  • Johnson C. Smith University (US)
  • Texas Wesleyan University (US)
  • Saint Mary's College of California (US)
  • University of West Florida (US)
  • Hartwick College (US)
  • Montclair State University (US)
  • Missouri Western State University (US)
  • Department of Mathematics, Missouri Western State University, Saint Joseph, MO 64507;
  • University of St. Thomas - Texas (US)
  • California Polytechnic State University (US)
  • City College of New York (US)
  • St. Edward's University (US)
  • Pomona College (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
  • Moravian University (US)
  • Luther College (US)
  • Cardinal Stritch University (US)
  • Utah Valley University (US)
  • Loyola Marymount University (US)
  • York College, City University of New York (US)
  • Wofford College (US)
  • Galen College of Nursing (US)
  • Widener University (US)
  • Macalester College (US)
  • McDaniel College (US)
  • Austin College (US)
  • Prairie View A&M University (US)
  • California Lutheran University (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Albion College (US)
  • Webster University (US)
  • New Mexico Highlands University (US)
  • Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
  • San Francisco State University (US)
  • North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • William Woods University (US)
  • University of Evansville (US)
  • Department of Biology, Denison University, Granville, OH 43023;
  • William & Mary (US)
  • Jackson State University (US)
  • California State University, Stanislaus (US)
  • Grinnell College (US)
Corresponding author
Elgin, Sarah C.R.
Venue
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2010-03
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
55-69
ISSN
1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163097000
Cited by
226
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) (submittedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (52005780)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R0I GM068388, R01GM068388)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
Keywords
Genomics Education Partnership, undergraduate research, genomics education, genome annotation, Drosophila, gene models, active learning, faculty professional development
MeSH terms
Animals, Faculty, Laboratories, Students, Universities, Genomics, Genetic Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review