Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning: Understanding the Wrong Answers—Teaching toward Conceptual Change

Open access
Tanner, Kimberly, Allen, Deborah·2005·Cell Biology Education
DOI 10.1187/cbe.05-02-0068
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

As a biology education community, we focus a great deal of time and energy on issues of “what ” students should be learning in the modern age of biology and then probing the extent to which students are learning these things. Addition-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1187/cbe.05-02-0068

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Tanner, K., & Allen, D.
Venue
Cell Biology Education
Publisher
American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB)
Published
2005-06
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
112-117
ISSN
1536-7509 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1187/cbe.05-02-0068
OpenAlex
W2172034233
Cited by
207
References
3
FWCI
15.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning: Understanding the Wrong Answers—Teaching toward Conceptual Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1187/cbe.05-02-0068
The paper
Tanner, K., & Allen, D. (2005). Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning: Understanding the Wrong Answers—Teaching toward Conceptual Change. Cell Biology Education. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-02-0068

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.