The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding by Design: A Framework for Effecting Curricular Development and Assessment
Open accessAbstract
Successful learning outcomes require the integration of content and meaningful assessment with effective pedagogy. However, development of coherent and cohesive curriculum is seemingly overwhelming even to experienced teachers. Obviously this creates a barrier to successful student learning. Understanding by Design (UbD) overcomes this impasse by providing concise and practical guidance for experienced and inexperienced teachers. In programs sponsored by the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health, teams composed of University of Wyoming graduate students and science teachers from grades 6 to 9 designed motivating, inquiry-based lesson plans intended to get students to think and act like scientists. In this process, teams utilized principles outlined in UbD with great success. UbD describes a practical and useful “backward” design process in which anticipated results are first identified; acceptable evidence for learning outcomes is established and, only then, are specific learning experiences and instruction planned. Additionally, UbD provides procedures to avoid content overload by focusing on “enduring principles.” WHERE, the UbD sieve for activities, was used effectively to develop tasks that are engaging, that are consistent with state educational standards, and that promote self-directed, life-long learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Understanding by design handbook
McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (1999) · Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development eBooks · Cited by 67
Cited by
Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design
Richards, J. C. (2013) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688212473293 · Cited by 485
Opportunities and risks involved in using ChatGPT to create first grade science lesson plans
Powell, W. A., & Courchesne, S. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0305337 · Cited by 104
Critical Thinking Assessment Across Four Sustainability-Related Experiential Learning Settings
Heinrich, W. F., Habron, G. B., Johnson, H. L., & Goralnik, L. (2015) · Journal of Experiential Education · doi:10.1177/1053825915592890 · Cited by 93
Remixing Approaches to Experiential Learning, Design, and Assessment
Heinrich, W. F., & Green, P. M. (2020) · Journal of Experiential Education · doi:10.1177/1053825920915608 · Cited by 65
Reforming the national core curriculum for bilingual education in Finland
Bergroth, M. (2016) · Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education · doi:10.1075/jicb.4.1.04ber · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Roth, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Wyoming (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roth, Don
- Venue
- CBE—Life Sciences Education
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 95-97
- ISSN
- 1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC1885909
- OpenAlex
- W2092544386
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0538642)
- National Institutes of Health (1r25rr022740-01)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Keywords
- Understanding by Design, backward design, curriculum development, assessment design, learning outcomes, inquiry-based learning, science education, junior high school science, lesson planning, enduring understandings, content overload, self-directed learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding by Design: A Framework for Effecting Curricular Development and Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1187/cbe.07-03-0012
- The paper
- Roth, D. (2007). Understanding by Design: A Framework for Effecting Curricular Development and Assessment. CBE—Life Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-03-0012