Information Fluency for Undergraduate Biology Majors: Applications of Inquiry-based Learning in a Developmental Biology Course
Open accessAbstract
Many initiatives for the improvement of undergraduate science education call for inquiry-based learning that emphasizes investigative projects and reading of the primary literature. These approaches give students an understanding of science as a process and help them integrate content presented in courses. At the same time, general initiatives to promote information fluency are being promoted on many college and university campuses. Information fluency refers to discipline-specific processing of information, and it involves integration of gathered information with specific ideas to form logical conclusions. We have implemented the use of inquiry-based learning to enhance and study discipline-specific information fluency skills in an upper-level undergraduate Developmental Biology course. In this study, an information literacy tutorial and a set of linked assignments using primary literature analysis were integrated with two inquiry-based laboratory research projects. Quantitaitve analysis of student responses suggests that the abilities of students to identify and apply valid sources of information were enhanced. Qualitative assessment revealed a set of patterns by which students gather and apply information. Self-assessment responses indicated that students recognized the impact of the assignments on their abilities to gather and apply information and that they were more confident about these abilities for future biology courses and beyond.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Peer-reviewed primary literature provides evaluated scientific content, and reading the primary literature consequently strengthens student understanding of the scientific process.
“Peer-reviewed primary literature provides evaluated scientific content, and reading the primary literature consequently strengthens student understanding of the scientific process (5, 8, 16).”
From Incorporating Primary Scientific Literature in Middle and High School Education (2016) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Gehring, K. M., & Eastman, D. A.
- Affiliations
- Connecticut College (US)
- Department of Biology and
- ORCID
- Eastman, Deborah A.
- Venue
- CBE—Life Sciences Education
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-63
- ISSN
- 1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2262132
- OpenAlex
- W2132686443
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 16.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- information fluency, information literacy, inquiry-based learning, developmental biology education, information literacy tutorials, student self-assessment, student self-confidence
- MeSH terms
- Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Humans, Developmental Biology, Problem-Based Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review