Family caregiver burden, skills preparedness, and quality of life in non-small cell lung cancer
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To describe burden, skills preparedness, and quality of life (QOL) for caregivers of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and describe how the findings informed the development of a caregiver palliative care intervention that aims to reduce caregiver burden, improve caregiving skills, and promote self-care. DESIGN: Descriptive, longitudinal. SETTING: A National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center in southern California. SAMPLE: 163 family members or friends aged 18 years or older and identified by patients as being a caregiver. METHODS: All eligible caregivers were approached by advanced practice nurses during a regularly scheduled patient clinic visit. Informed consent was obtained prior to study participation. Outcome measures were completed at baseline and repeated at 7, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. Descriptive statistics were computed for all variables, and one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to test for change over time for all predictor and outcome variables. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Caregiver burden, skills preparedness, psychological distress, and QOL. FINDINGS: Caregivers were highly functional. Caregiver burden related to subjective demands increased significantly over time. Perceived skills preparedness was high at baseline but decreased over time. Psychological distress was moderate but increased in the study period. Overall QOL was moderate at baseline and decreased significantly over time. Psychological well-being had the worst QOL score. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers experienced high levels of caregiver burden and reported deteriorations in psychological well-being and overall QOL. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses need to ensure that caregivers receive information that supports the caregiving role throughout the cancer trajectory. KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION: Although family caregivers are profoundly impacted by a loved one's lung cancer diagnosis, the literature about caregiver burden, skills preparedness, and QOL is limited. Current evidence suggests that family caregivers can be negatively impacted by a loved one's cancer diagnosis. Caregiver-specific support interventions are needed to eliminate the burden of caregiving in lung cancer.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research by the authors suggests that lung cancer family caregivers experience significant psychological distress, higher caregiver burden, and decreased QOL related to caregiving.
“Our previous research suggests that lung cancer family caregivers experience significant psychological distress, higher caregiver burden, and decreased QOL related to their caregiving role.8–11”
From A Multimedia Self-management Intervention to Prepare Cancer Patients and Family Caregivers for Lung Surgery and Postoperative Recovery (2017) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 212
- Authors
- Grant, M., Sun, V., Fujinami, R., Sidhu, R., Otis-Green, S., Juarez, G., Klein, L., & Ferrell, B.
- Affiliations
- City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Oncology Nursing Forum
- Publisher
- Oncology Nursing Society (ONS)
- Published
- 2013-06-26
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 337-346
- ISSN
- 0190-535X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-0688
- PMC
- PMC3695406
- OpenAlex
- W2034596217
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 25.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Oncology nursing forum (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (P01CA136396)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Keywords
- family caregivers, caregiver burden, non-small cell lung cancer, quality of life, psychological distress, psychological well-being, caregiver self-care, caregiver support interventions
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Oncology Nursing, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Cost of Illness, Family Nursing, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review