The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Examining the Effects of a Structured Mentorship Program on the Nurse Mentor: A Pilot Study Engaging Oncology Nurses
Abstract
Mentorship programs are an emerging strategy in the nursing profession to support and develop new staff in the field; this 12-month structured program found those in the mentoring role benefit, too. The sample included 11 oncology RNs working in the inpatient acute hospital setting, serving as mentors in the oncology nurse residency program. The results were statistically significant for compassion satisfaction, and burnout scores decreased. Qualitative analysis of the open-ended questions revealed mentors felt confident they make a difference, enhanced professional growth, and reduced burnout.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“programs that fostered more intensive, sustained, and meaningful interpersonal connections horizontally among peers,18-21 as well as vertically with supervisors,22 produced more consistent positive effects.”
From What do we really know about addressing burnout among healthcare workers? Maybe less than we think (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What do we really know about addressing burnout among healthcare workers? Maybe less than we think
Goetzel, R. Z., Fazen, L. E., Kent, K. B., Roemer, E. C., & Saldanha, I. J. (2026) · Health affairs scholar · doi:10.1093/haschl/qxag041
“14-17 By contrast, programs that fostered more intensive, sustained, and meaningful interpersonal connections horizontally among peers, 18-21 as well as vertically with super-visors, 22 produced more consistent positive effects.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Drury, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Utah (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zach Drury
- Venue
- Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing
- Publisher
- Oncology Nursing Society (ONS)
- Published
- 2022-01-25
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-30
- ISSN
- 1092-1095 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4206914637
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical journal of oncology nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mentoring and Academic Development
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Keywords
- mentoring programs, nurse mentors, oncology nurses, nurse residency programs, compassion satisfaction, burnout, career development
- MeSH terms
- Mentoring, Burnout, Professional, Humans, Mentors, Nurse Clinicians, Pilot Projects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
