Cited by 2Ethics in Clinical ResearchCultural Competency in Health CareDiversity and Career in Medicine

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Disparity of Equitable Representation in Cancer Clinical Trials: Nursing Perspectives

Marisa Shapiro·2022·Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing

Abstract

Earn free contact hours: Click here to connect to the evaluation. Certified nurses can claim no more than 1 total ILNA point for this program. Up to 1 ILNA point may be applied to Oncology Nursing Practice OR Roles of the APRN OR Professional Practice/Performance. See www.oncc.org for complete details on certification.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1188/22.cjon.449-454

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Shapiro, M.
Corresponding author
Marisa Shapiro
Venue
Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing
Published
2022-08-01
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
449-454
ISSN
1092-1095 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293900557
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical journal of oncology nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
cancer clinical trials, equitable representation, racial and ethnic disparities, nursing perspective, oncology nursing, clinical trial participation
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disparity of Equitable Representation in Cancer Clinical Trials: Nursing Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1188/22.cjon.449-454
The paper
Shapiro, M. (2022). Disparity of Equitable Representation in Cancer Clinical Trials: Nursing Perspectives. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1188/22.cjon.449-454