The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA vaccination: antigen presentation and the induction of immunity
Open accessAbstract
DNA vaccination, or genetic immunization, is a novel vaccine technology that has great potential for reducing infectious disease and cancer-induced morbidity and mortality worldwide. Since their inception, DNA vaccines have been used to stimulate protective immunity against many infectious pathogens, malignancies, and autoimmune disorders in animal models. Plasmid DNA encoding a polypeptide protein antigen is introduced into a host where it enters host cells and serves as an epigenetic template for the high-efficiency translation of its antigen. An immune response, which is mediated by the cellular and/or humoral arms of the immune system and is specific for the plasmid-encoded antigen, ensues. It is thought that “professional” antigen-presenting cells play a dominant role in the induction of immunity by presenting vaccine peptides on MHC class I molecules, following direct transfection or “cross”-presentation, and MHC class II molecules after antigen capture and processing within the endocytic pathway. The correlates of immunity can be manipulated according to many immunization parameters, including the method of vaccine delivery, presence of genetic adjuvants, and vaccine regimen. DNA vaccines first advanced to the clinic five years ago, and the initial picture of their utility in humans is emerging. However, further analysis is required to determine their ultimate efficacy and safety in human beings. This technology has acquired a strong foothold in the field of experimental immunotherapy, and it is hoped that it will eventually represent the next generation of prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Direct Gene Transfer into Mouse Muscle in Vivo
Wolff, J. A., Malone, R. W., Williams, P., Chong, W., Acsadi, G., Jani, A., & Felgner, P. L. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1690918 · Cited by 4,173
T-cell help for cytotoxic T lymphocytes is mediated by CD40–CD40L interactions
Schoenberger, S. P., Toes, R. E. M., van der Voort, E. I. H., Offringa, R., & Melief, C. J. M. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31002 · Cited by 2,615
Cited by
Dendritic Cells: Immune Regulators in Health and Disease
Lipscomb, M. F., & Masten, B. J. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00023.2001 · Cited by 465
Evaluation of candidate vaccine approaches for MERS-CoV
Wang, L., Shi, W., Joyce, M. G., Modjarrad, K., Zhang, Y., Leung, K., Lees, C. R., Zhou, T., Yassine, H. M., Kanekiyo, M., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8712 · Cited by 299
Next‐Generation Vaccines: Nanoparticle‐Mediated DNA and mRNA Delivery
Ho, W., Gao, M., Li, F., Li, Z., Zhang, X., & Xu, X. (2021) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202001812 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Shedlock, D. J., & Weiner, D. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Leukocyte Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 793-806
- ISSN
- 0741-5400 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3673
- OpenAlex
- W2112333290
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA vaccination: antigen presentation and the induction of immunity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1189/jlb.68.6.793
- The paper
- Shedlock, D. J., & Weiner, D. B. (2000). DNA vaccination: antigen presentation and the induction of immunity. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.68.6.793
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.