The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wave propagation and sampling theory; Part II, Sampling theory and complex waves
Abstract
Morlet et al (1982, this issue) showed the advantages of using complex values for both waves and characteristics of the media. We simulated the theoretical tools we present here, using the Goupillaud-Kunetz algorithm.Now we present sampling methods for complex signals or traces corresponding to received waves, and sampling methods for complex characterization of multilayered or heterogeneous media.Regarding the complex signals, we present a two-dimensional (2-D) method of sampling in the time-frequency domain using a special or 'extended' Gabor expansion on a set of basic wavelets adapted to phase preservation. Such a 2-D expansion permits us to handle in a proper manner instantaneous frequency spectra. We show the differences between 'wavelet resolution' and 'sampling grid resolution.' We also show the importance of phase preservation in high-resolution seismic.Regarding the media, we show how analytical studies of wave propagation in periodic structured layers could help when trying to characterize the physical properties of the layers and their large scale granularity as a result of complex deconvolution. Analytical studies of wave propagation in periodic structures are well known in solid state physics, and lead to the so-called 'Bloch waves.'The introduction of complex waves leads to replacing the classical wave equation by a Schrodinger equation.Finally, we show that complex wave equations, Gabor expansion, and Bloch waves are three different ways of introducing the tools of quantum mechanics in high-resolution seismic (Gabor, 1946; Kittel, 1976, Morlet, 1975). And conversely, the Goupillaud-Kunetz algorithm and an extended Gabor expansion may be of some use in solid state physics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Cited by
The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis
Daubechies, I. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.57199 · Cited by 6,483
Linear and quadratic time-frequency signal representations
Hlawatsch, F., & Boudreaux-Bartels, G. F. (1992) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.127284 · Cited by 1,632
Wave propagation and sampling theory; Part I, Complex signal and scattering in multilayered media
Morlet, J., Arens, G., Fourgeau, E., & Giard, D. (1982) · Geophysics · doi:10.1190/1.1441328 · Cited by 1,380
Self-citationWavelet analysis for geophysical applications
Kumar, P., & Foufoula‐Georgiou, E. (1997) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/97rg00427 · Cited by 992
Diagnosis of pathological speech with streamlined features for long short-term memory learning
Pham, T. D., Holmes, S. B., Zou, L., Patel, M., & Coulthard, P. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.107976 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Morlet, J., Arens, G., Fourgeau, E., & Giard, D.
- Venue
- Geophysics
- Publisher
- Society of Exploration Geophysicists
- Published
- 1982-02-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 222-236
- ISSN
- 0016-8033 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2093132633
- Cited by
- 731
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wave propagation and sampling theory; Part II, Sampling theory and complex waves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1190/1.1441329
- The paper
- Morlet, J., Arens, G., Fourgeau, E., & Giard, D. (1982). Wave propagation and sampling theory; Part II, Sampling theory and complex waves. Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.