The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anisotropic effective-medium modeling of the elastic properties of shales
Abstract
Shales are complex porous materials, normally consisting of percolating and interpenetrating fluid and solid phases. The solid phase is generally comprised of several mineral components and forms an intricate and anisotropic microstructure. The shape, orientation, and connection of the two phases control the anisotropic elastic properties of the composite solid. We develop a theoretical framework that allows us to predict the effective elastic properties of shales. Its usefulness is demonstrated with numerical modeling and by comparison with established ultrasonic laboratory experiments. The theory is based on a combination of anisotropic formulations of the self-consistent (SCA) and differential effective-medium (DEM) ap proximations. This combination guarantees that both the fluid and solid phases percolate at all porosities. Our modeling of the elastic properties of shales proceeds in four steps. First, we consider the case of an aligned biconnected clay-fluid composite composed of ellipsoidal inclusions. Anisotropic elastic constants are estimated for a clay-fluid composite as a function of the fluid-filled porosity and the aspect ratio of the inclusions. Second, a new processing technique is developed to estimate the distribution of clay platelet orientations from digitized scanning electron microphotographs (SEM). Third, the derived clay platelet distribution is employed to estimate the effective elastic parameters of a solid comprising clay-fluid composites oriented at different angles. Finally, silt minerals are included in the calculations as isolated spherical inclusions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bruggeman, D. A. G. (1935) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19354160705 · Cited by 8,645
Cited by
Natural Fractures in shale: A review and new observations
Gale, J. F. W., Laubach, S. E., Olson, J. E., Eichhuble, P., & Fall, A. (2014) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/08121413151 · Cited by 1,034
Mondol, N. H., Bjørlykke, K., Jahren, J., & Høeg, K. (2007) · Marine and Petroleum Geology · doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2007.03.006 · Cited by 373
Modelling of exfoliated graphite
CELZARD, A., MARECHE, J., & FURDIN, G. (2005) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.01.001 · Cited by 275
Model for the Viscosity of Particle Dispersions
BICERANO, J., DOUGLAS, J. F., & BRUNE, D. A. (1999) · Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part C: Polymer Reviews · doi:10.1081/mc-100101428 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Hornby, B. E., Schwartz, L. M., & Hudson, J. A.
- Venue
- Geophysics
- Publisher
- Society of Exploration Geophysicists
- Published
- 1994-10-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1570-1583
- ISSN
- 0016-8033 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2000839252
- Cited by
- 604
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anisotropic effective-medium modeling of the elastic properties of shales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1190/1.1443546
- The paper
- Hornby, B. E., Schwartz, L. M., & Hudson, J. A. (1994). Anisotropic effective-medium modeling of the elastic properties of shales. Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443546
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.