The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seismic inversion for reservoir properties combining statistical rock physics and geostatistics: A review
Abstract
There are various approaches for quantitative estimation of reservoir properties from seismic inversion. A general Bayesian formulation for the inverse problem can be implemented in two different work flows. In the sequential approach, first seismic data are inverted, deterministically or stochastically, into elastic properties; then rock-physics models transform those elastic properties to the reservoir property of interest. The joint or simultaneous work flow accounts for the elastic parameters and the reservoir properties, often in a Bayesian formulation, guaranteeing consistency between the elastic and reservoir properties. Rock physics plays the important role of linking elastic parameters such as impedances and velocities to reservoir properties of interest such as lithologies, porosity, and pore fluids. Geostatistical methods help add constraints of spatial correlation, conditioning to different kinds of data and incorporating subseismic scales of heterogeneities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation
Tarantola, A. (2005) · doi:10.1137/1.9780898717921 · Cited by 6,585
Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation
Tarantola, A. (1987) · International Linear Collider · Cited by 2,193
Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., & Dvorkin, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108333016 · Cited by 1,734
Self-citationGlobal Optimization Methods in Geophysical Inversion
Sen, M. K., & Stoffa, P. L. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511997570 · Cited by 990
Quantitative Seismic Interpretation: Applying Rock Physics Tools to Reduce Interpretation Risk
Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., & Mavko, G. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511600074 · Cited by 943
Self-citationNonlinear one-dimensional seismic waveform inversion using simulated annealing
Sen, M. K., & Stoffa, P. L. (1991) · Geophysics · doi:10.1190/1.1442973 · Cited by 507
Quantitative seismic interpretation applying rock physics tools to reduce interpretation risk
Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., & Mavko, G. (2008) · Cited by 485
Self-citationRecovery of the acoustic impedance from reflection seismograms
Oldenburg, D. W., Scheuer, T., & Levy, S. (1983) · Geophysics · doi:10.1190/1.1441413 · Cited by 480
Mixture Theories for Rock Properties
Berryman, J. G. (2013) · AGU Reference Shelf · doi:10.1029/rf003p0205 · Cited by 463
Graña, D., & Rossa, E. D. (2010) · Geophysics · doi:10.1190/1.3386676 · Cited by 439
Metadata
- Authors
- Bosch, M., Mukerji, T., & Gonzalez, E. F.
- Venue
- Geophysics
- Publisher
- Society of Exploration Geophysicists
- Published
- 2010-01-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 75A165-75A176
- ISSN
- 0016-8033 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2171680516
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 8.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seismic inversion for reservoir properties combining statistical rock physics and geostatistics: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1190/1.3478209
- The paper
- Bosch, M., Mukerji, T., & Gonzalez, E. F. (2010). Seismic inversion for reservoir properties combining statistical rock physics and geostatistics: A review. Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3478209
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.