The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methods to compute fault images, extract fault surfaces, and estimate fault throws from 3D seismic images
Abstract
Fault interpretation enhances our understanding of complex geologic structures and stratigraphy apparent in 3D seismic images. Common steps in this interpretation include image processing to highlight faults, the construction of fault surfaces, and estimation of fault throws. Although all three of these steps have been automated to some extent by others, fault interpretation today typically requires significant manual effort, suggesting that further improvements in automatic methods are feasible and worthwhile. I first used an efficient algorithm to compute images of fault likelihoods, strikes, and dips from a 3D seismic image. From these three fault images, I then automatically extracted fault surfaces as meshes of quadrilaterals that coincide with ridges of fault likelihood. A quadrilateral mesh is a simple data structure alongside which one can easily gather samples of the 3D seismic image. I automatically estimated fault throws by minimizing differences in values of samples gathered from opposite sides of a fault, while constraining the variation of throw within a fault surface. I tested the fidelity of estimated fault throws by using them to undo faulting. After unfaulting, reflectors in 3D seismic images were more continuous than those in the original 3D seismic image. In one example, this unfaulting test supported the observation that some extracted fault surfaces have unusual conical shapes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic Programming Algorithm Optimization for Spoken Word Recognition
Sakoe, H., & Chiba, S. (1978) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tassp.1978.1163055 · Cited by 6,727
Cited by
Araya-Polo, M., Jennings, J., Adler, A., & Dahlke, T. (2018) · The Leading Edge · doi:10.1190/tle37010058.1 · Cited by 558
Automated fault detection without seismic processing
Araya-Polo, M., Dahlke, T., Frogner, C., Zhang, C., Poggio, T., & Hohl, D. (2017) · The Leading Edge · doi:10.1190/tle36030208.1 · Cited by 257
A systematic review of data science and machine learning applications to the oil and gas industry
Tariq, Z., Aljawad, M. S., Hasan, A., Murtaza, M., Mohammed, E., El-Husseiny, A., Alarifi, S. A., Mahmoud, M., & Abdulraheem, A. (2021) · Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology · doi:10.1007/s13202-021-01302-2 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Hale, D.
- Venue
- Geophysics
- Publisher
- Society of Exploration Geophysicists
- Published
- 2013-02-25
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- O33-O43
- ISSN
- 0016-8033 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2118701387
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods to compute fault images, extract fault surfaces, and estimate fault throws from 3D seismic images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1190/geo2012-0331.1
- The paper
- Hale, D. (2013). Methods to compute fault images, extract fault surfaces, and estimate fault throws from 3D seismic images. Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0331.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.