The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A study of five cervicocephalic relocation tests in three different subject groups
Abstract
Objective: To compare head relocation accuracy in traumatic (whiplash), insidious onset neck pain patients and asymptomatic subjects when targeting a natural head posture (NHP) and complex predetermined positions. Design: A case–control study. Setting: University-based musculoskeletal research clinic. Participants: Sixty-three volunteers divided into three groups of similar gender and age: Group 1 ( n = 21) an asymptomatic group; group 2 ( n = 20) insidious onset neck pain; group 3 ( n = 22) a history of whiplash injury. Intervention: Five randomly ordered tests designed to detect relocation accuracy of the head. Outcome measures: A 3-Space Fastrak system measured the mean absolute relocation error of three trials of each relocation test. Results: A significant difference was found between groups in one of the tests targeting the NHP ( p = 0.001). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons revealed a significant difference ( p £ 0.05) between the asymptomatic group and each symptomatic group. The difference between the symptomatic groups just failed to reach significance ( p = 0.07). None of the other four tests revealed significant differences. Conclusion: The test of targeting the NHP indicates that relocation inaccuracy exists in patients with neck pain with a trend to suggest that the deficit may be greater in whiplash patients. Tests employing unfamiliar postures or more complex movement were not successful in differentiating subject groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MANUAL MOTOR PERFORMANCE IN A DEAFFERENTED MAN
ROTHWELL, J. C., TRAUB, M. M., DAY, B. L., OBESO, J. A., THOMAS, P. K., & MARSDEN, C. D. (1982) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/105.3.515 · Cited by 862
Massion, J. (1994) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0959-4388(94)90137-6 · Cited by 747
Cited by
Effect of Neck Exercise on Sitting Posture in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
Falla, D., Jull, G., Russell, T., Vicenzino, B., & Hodges, P. (2007) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20060009 · Cited by 391
Self-citationSjölander, P., Michaelson, P., Jaric, S., & Djupsjöbacka, M. (2008) · Manual Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.math.2006.10.002 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Kristjansson, E., Dall'Alba, P., & Jull, G.
- Venue
- Clinical Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 768-774
- ISSN
- 0269-2155 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0873
- OpenAlex
- W2142574984
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A study of five cervicocephalic relocation tests in three different subject groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1191/0269215503cr676oa
- The paper
- Kristjansson, E., Dall'Alba, P., & Jull, G. (2003). A study of five cervicocephalic relocation tests in three different subject groups. Clinical Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215503cr676oa
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.