Cited by 56Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsPalliative and Oncologic Care

Management of diabetes during the last days of life: attitudes of consultant diabetologists and consultant palliative care physicians in the UK

Ford-Dunn, S, Smith, A, Quin, J·2006·Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Diabetes is an increasingly common condition and hence, managing dying patients with diabetes as a co-morbidity will become a frequent challenge. It is uncertain whether there is net beneficence in preventing hyperglycaemia in diabetic patients during the terminal phase or whether the distress involved in administering therapy and blood glucose monitoring may outweigh this ordeal. Since there is no available evidence upon which to base clinical decisions, a semi-structured questionnaire based around three clinical vignettes was sent to consultants in diabetes and palliative care in the UK. There was consensus of opinion from both groups of consultants that treatment and monitoring should be stopped in patients with type 2 diabetes, once in the terminal phase. There was less consensus regarding management of type 1 diabetes. Practical issues were raised by both groups of consultants and clinical guidelines are suggested.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1191/0269216306pm1128oa

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An individual has the right to refuse testing and treatment, whereas health care professionals may consider withdrawing treatment and limiting diagnostic testing, including a reduction in the frequency of blood glucose monitoring.

    “An individual has the right to refuse testing and treatment, whereas health care professionals may consider withdrawing treatment and limiting diagnostic testing, including a reduction in the frequency of blood glucose monitoring (175,176).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [175]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ford-Dunn, S., Smith, A., & Quin, J.
Affiliations
  • Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals,
  • Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Venue
Palliative Medicine
Published
2006-04
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
197-203
ISSN
  • 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-030X
OpenAlex
W2110194238
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palliative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, end-of-life care, terminal phase, blood glucose monitoring, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, consultant attitudes, palliative care, diabetes management, clinical guidelines
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Health, Consultants, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, Medical Staff, Hospital, Palliative Care, Patient Participation, Prognosis, Terminal Care, Terminally Ill, Disease Management, Health Care Surveys, Withholding Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review