The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Challenges in palliative care research; recruitment, attrition and compliance: experience from a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in palliative cancer care often experience methodological problems. In this paper we discuss issues of major concern, including recruitment, patient attrition and compliance, arising from an RCT that compared comprehensive palliative care to conventional care. The main criteria for trial entry were incurable malignant disease and a survival expectancy of between 2 and 9 months. Patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL), self-assessed by multi-item questionnaires, was a defined endpoint. The planned number of patients was successfully recruited, although the patients were referred late in the course of their disease so that follow-up tended to be short. Compliance in completing HRQL questionnaires was good up to 1 month before the patient's death; but in the final weeks it was found to drop substantially. Based on our experience, recommendations are given for those planning similar research. Procedures for improving patient recruitment are suggested, stressing the need for local data management, repeated information to referral sources, extensive screening for potentially eligible patients and simple referral routines. Precise inclusion criteria, including prognostic factors other than physicians' estimates of life expectancy, should be used to ensure a sufficient follow-up period. For HRQL assessment, multi-item questionnaires can achieve excellent compliance up to 1 month before patients' death, but in order to evaluate the very final weeks of life we recommend the use of simpler methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., Haes, J. C. J. M. D., et al. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 · Cited by 16,005
Self-citation
Cited by
Gomes, B., Calanzani, N., Curiale, V., McCrone, P., Higginson, I. J., & de Brito, M. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007760.pub2 · Cited by 785
Effectiveness of Specialized Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
Zimmermann, C., Riechelmann, R., Krzyzanowska, M., Rodin, G., & Tannock, I. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.14.1698 · Cited by 468
Wilkinson, S. M., Love, S. B., Westcombe, A. M., Gambles, M. A., Burgess, C. C., Cargill, A., Young, T., Maher, E. J., & Ramirez, A. J. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.08.9987 · Cited by 316
The Norwegian Brief Pain Inventory Questionnaire
Klepstad, P., Loge, J. H., Borchgrevink, P. C., Mendoza, T. R., Cleeland, C. S., & Kaasa, S. (2002) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00526-2 · Cited by 313
Self-citationA palliative-care intervention and death at home: a cluster randomised trial
Jordhøy, M. S., Fayers, P., Saltnes, T., Ahlner-Elmqvist, M., Jannert, M., & Kaasa, S. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02678-7 · Cited by 310
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jordhøy, M. S., Kaasa, S., Fayers, P., Underland, G., & Ahlner-Elmqvist, M.
- Venue
- Palliative Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 299-310
- ISSN
- 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-030X
- OpenAlex
- W2134063986
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Challenges in palliative care research; recruitment, attrition and compliance: experience from a randomized controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1191/026921699668963873
- The paper
- Jordhøy, M. S., Kaasa, S., Fayers, P., Underland, G., & Ahlner-Elmqvist, M. (1999). Challenges in palliative care research; recruitment, attrition and compliance: experience from a randomized controlled trial. Palliative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1191/026921699668963873
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.