Software-sorted geographies
Open accessAbstract
This paper explores the central role of computerized code in shaping the social and geographical politics of inequality in advanced societies. The central argument is that, while such processes are necessarily multifaceted, multiscaled, complex and ambivalent, a great variety of `software-sorting' techniques is now being widely applied in efforts to try to separate privileged and marginalized groups and places across a wide range of sectors and domains. This paper's central demonstration is that the overwhelming bulk of software-sorting applications is closely associated with broader transformations from Keynesian to neoliberal service regimes. To illustrate such processes of software-sorting, the paper analyses recent research addressing three examples of software-sorting in practice. These address physical and electronic mobility systems, online geographical information systems (GIS), and face-recognition closed circuit television (CCTV) systems covering city streets. The paper finishes by identifying theoretical, research and policy implications of the diffusion of software-sorted geographies within which computerized code continually orchestrates inequalities through technological systems embedded within urban environments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In urban science, profiles can socially sort places for particular policy interventions or marketing, as done by the geodemographics industry.
“Or in the case of urban science to socially sort places to receive certain policy interventions or marketing as practised by the geodemographics industry [71].”
From The ethics of smart cities and urban science (2016) · cites this paper as [71]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 489
- Authors
- Graham, S. D. N.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Graham, Stephen D.N.
- Venue
- Progress in Human Geography
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 562-580
- ISSN
- 0309-1325 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0288
- OpenAlex
- W2145919769
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 43.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Progress in Human Geography (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
- Keywords
- inequality, neoliberalism, mobility systems, face recognition, closed-circuit television, urban surveillance, social sorting, marginalized communities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review