Functional near-infrared spectroscopy in psychiatry
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has been used in healthcare and medical research for the past two decades. In particular, the use of fNIRS in academic and clinical psychiatry has increased rapidly owing to its advantages over other neuroimaging modalities. fNIRS is a tool that can potentially supplement clinical interviews and mental state examinations to establish a psychiatric diagnosis and monitor treatment progress. This article provides a review of the theoretical background of fNIRS, key principles of its applications in psychiatry and its limitations, and shares a vision of its future applicability in psychiatric research and clinical practice. Learning Objectives: • Understand the theoretical background, mechanism of action and clinical applications of fNIRS and compare it to other neuroimaging modalities • Understand the use of fNIRS in academic and clinical psychiatry through current research findings • Be able to evaluate the future potential of fNIRS and formulate new ideas for using fNIRS in academic and clinical psychiatry
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The MBI remains the most established way to measure burnout when this meta-analysis was conducted.
“Unless burnout can be measured by neuroimaging or other biological methods as in some psychiatric symptoms [98,99], the MBI remains the most established way to measure burnout when this meta-analysis was conducted.”
From Prevalence of Burnout in Medical and Surgical Residents: A Meta-Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [99]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Lai, C. Y. Y., Ho, C. S. H., Lim, C. R., & Ho, R. C. M.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Ho, Cyrus S. H.
- Venue
- BJPsych Advances
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 324-330
- ISSN
- 2056-4678 (ISSN-L)
- 2056-4686
- OpenAlex
- W2752734832
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 4.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BJPsych Advances (publishedVersion)
- Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- functional near-infrared spectroscopy, psychiatry, psychiatric diagnosis, treatment monitoring, neuroimaging, cerebral oxygenation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review