Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Stalking risks to celebrities and public figures

Wilson, Simon, Dempsey, Charles, Farnham, Frank, Manze, Tony, Taylor, Alice·2018·BJPsych Advances

Abstract

SUMMARY: Prominent figures are frequently subjected to unwanted and intrusive attentions. Such stalking behaviour is often driven by psychotic illness, angrily blaming the public figure for delusional persecution (resentful motivation), or based on erotomanic delusions (intimacy seeking motivation), for example. This behaviour can cause psychological harm to both perpetrator and victim, and is unlawful. In the rare instances where a public figure has been attacked, the perpetrator has usually had a history of such stalking behaviour and of severe mental illness. For these reasons, early identification and diversion into appropriate care and treatment will be for the benefit of both parties and will prevent more serious violence in a minority of cases. The importance of the provision of education to improve both reporting rates by victims and an appropriate response from the criminal justice system is highlighted. A multi-agency approach involving the criminal justice system and mental health services is the most effective means of achieving these aims. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: •Learn that severe mental illness, particularly psychosis, is often an important driver of stalking behaviour •Learn that delusional disorder is a treatable mental illness •Appreciate that prevention rather than prediction is the approach to managing the risks of high-harm low-probability outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bja.2017.22

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1192/pb.37.10.340 · DOI
  2. Warren, 2014, International Handbook of Threat Assessment
  3. 10.1080/14789949.2012.727453 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Spores, 1988, Running Amok: An Historical Inquiry
  5. 10.1080/14789949.2015.1054857 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/14789940412331313368 · DOI
  7. 10.1192/pb.bp.115.053017 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/14789940802197074 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/tam0000024 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/bsl.999 · DOI
  11. McCauley, 2013, Characteristics of lone-wolf violent offenders: a comparison of assassins and school attackers, Perspectives on Terrorism, 7, 4
  12. MacKenzie, 2009, The Stalking Risk Profile: Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Stalkers
  13. 10.1080/14789949.2015.1124908 · DOI
  14. James, 2008, Attacks on the British royal family: the role of psychotic illness, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 36, 59
  15. Hoffmann, 2008, Stalking, Threatening, and Attacking Public Figures
  16. 10.1520/JFS14732J · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s001270050210 · DOI
  18. 10.1520/JFS14457J · DOI
  19. 2017, Making Prevention a Reality: Identifying, Assessing, and Managing the Threat of Targeted Attacks
  20. 10.1037/tam0000016 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/med:psych/9780195326383.001.0001 · DOI
  22. Dietz, 1991, Threatening and otherwise inappropriate letters to Hollywood celebrities, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 36, 185, 10.1520/JFS13019J · DOI
  23. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.12 · DOI
  24. 10.1201/b19689 · DOI
  25. Mullen, 2009, Stalkers and their Victims
  26. 10.1002/bsl.2255 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/070674370605100207 · DOI
  28. Dietz, 1991, Threatening and otherwise inappropriate letters to members of the United States Congress, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 36, 1445, 10.1520/JFS13165J · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01077.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. Dunn, 2014, International Handbook of Threat Assessment
  31. 10.1017/S003329170700181X · DOI
  32. 10.1080/14789949.2014.981564 · DOI
  33. 2016, Compendium: Intimate Personal Violence and Partner Abuse
  34. 10.1080/1057610X.2015.1008341 · DOI
  35. James, 2014, International Handbook of Threat Assessment
  36. 10.1192/pb.bp.110.033910 · DOI
  37. 10.1192/bjp.184.4.352 · DOI
  38. 2017, Confidentiality: Good Practice in Handling Patient Information
  39. Hacking, 1998, Mad Travellers: Reflections on the Reality of Transient Mental Illnesses
  40. Jay, 2012, The Influencing Machine: James Tilly Matthews and the Air Loom
  41. MacDonald, 1968, Homicidal Threats
  42. 10.1177/0004867415581022 · DOI
  43. 10.1192/pb.36.6.236 · DOI
  44. Malsch, 2002, Stalking van bekende personen [Stalking of Well-known People]
  45. 10.1080/14789949.2015.1124909 · DOI
  46. Régis, 1890, Les régicides dans l'histoire et dans le présent: etude médico-psychologique

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wilson, S., Dempsey, C., Farnham, F., Manze, T., & Taylor, A.
Venue
BJPsych Advances
Published
2018-04-25
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
152-160
ISSN
  • 2056-4678
  • 2056-4686
Cited by
9
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.