Cited by 106School Health and Nursing EducationMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental Health

Do no harm: can school mental health interventions cause iatrogenic harm?

Open access
Foulkes, Lucy, Stringaris, Argyris·2023·BJPsych Bulletin

Abstract

In recent years, there have been extensive efforts in secondary schools to prevent, treat and raise awareness of adolescent mental health problems. For some adolescents, these efforts are essential and will lead to a reduction in clinical symptoms. However, it is also vital to assess whether, for others, the current approach might be causing iatrogenic harm. A growing body of quantitative research indicates that some aspects of school-based mental health interventions increase distress or clinical symptoms, relative to control activities, and qualitative work indicates that this may be partly due to the interventions themselves.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjb.2023.9

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The negative outcomes or adverse effects of the program were linked to the program itself.

    “The negative outcomes or adverse effects of the program were linked to the program itself (Foulkes and Stringaris, 2023).”

    From Outcome domains and assessment measures in school-based youth mentoring programs: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as Foulkes and Stringaris, 2023

    In “The problem with school mental health interventions,” the paper defines iatrogenic harm as adverse effects from the treatment approach itself and reports instances in which students were worse off receiving an intervention than not receiving it. It supports the general link, but does not identify or assess the particular program implied by “the program.” (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [2]Werner-Seidler A, Spanos S, Calear AL, Perry Y, Torok M, O'Dea B, et al. School-based depression and anxiety prevention programs: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2021: 89; 102079. 34571372
  2. [3]Carey E, Ridler I, Ford T, Stringaris A. When is a ‘small effect’ actually large and impactful? PsyArXiv [Preprint] 2023. Available from: https://psyarxiv.com/v3fjk/. 37226639
  3. [4]Bonell C, Jamal F, Melendez-Torres GJ, Cummins S. ‘Dark logic’: theorising the harmful consequences of public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 2015; 69: 95–8. 25403381
  4. [5]Guzman-Holst C, Zaneva M, Chessell C, Creswell C, Bowes L. Research review: do antibullying interventions reduce internalizing symptoms? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression exploring intervention components, moderators, and mechanisms. J Child Psychol Psychiat 2022: 63(12): 1454–65. 35474211 PMC9790441
  5. [6]Andrews JL, Birrell L, Chapman C, Teesson M, Newton N, Allsop S, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of a universal eHealth school-based prevention programme for depression and anxiety, and the moderating role of friendship network characteristics. Psychol Med [Epub ahead of print] 15 Jul 2022. Available from: 10.1017/S0033291722002033. 35838377 · DOI
  6. [7]Montero-Marin J, Allwood M, Ball S, Crane C, De Wilde K, Hinze V, et al. School-based mindfulness training in early adolescence: what works, for whom and how in the MYRIAD trial? Evid Based Ment Health 2022; 25: 117–24. 35820993 PMC9340034
  7. [8]Lilienfeld SO. Psychological treatments that cause harm. Perspect Psychol Sci 2007; 2: 53– 70. 26151919
  8. [9]Hayes D, Za'ba N. What metrics of harm are being captured in clinical trials involving talking treatments for young people? A systematic review of registered studies on the ISRCTN. Couns Psychother Res 2022; 22: 108–29.
  9. [10]Bastounis A, Callaghan P, Lykomitrou F, Aubeeluck A, Michail M. Exploring students’ participation in universal, depression and anxiety, prevention programmes at school: a meta-aggregation. School Ment Health 2017; 9: 372–85.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foulkes, L., & Stringaris, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Foulkes, Lucy
Venue
BJPsych Bulletin
Published
2023-02-27
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
267-269
ISSN
  • 2056-4694 (ISSN-L)
  • 2056-4708
OpenAlex
W4322495277
Cited by
106
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22
FWCI
38.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJPsych Bulletin (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
iatrogenic injury, school-based mental health programs, adolescent mental health, high school students, adolescent distress, clinical symptoms, mental health promotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review