Investigating the relationship between euthanasia and/or assisted suicide and rates of non-assisted suicide: systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Background: Euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) are practices that aim to alleviate the suffering of people with life-limiting illnesses, but are controversial. One area of debate is the relationship between EAS and suicide rates in the population, where there have been claims that availability of EAS will reduce the number of self-initiated deaths (EAS and suicide combined). Others claim that legislation for EAS makes it acceptable to end one's own life, a message at variance with that of suicide prevention campaigns. Aims: To examine the relationship between the introduction of EAS and rates of non-assisted suicide and self-initiated death. Method: We conducted a systematic review to examine the association between EAS and rates of non-assisted suicide and of self-initiated death. We searched PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO and Science Direct, until 20 December 2021. Studies that examined EAS and reported data on population-based suicide rates were included. Results: Six studies met the inclusion criteria; four reported increases in overall rates of self-initiated death and, in some cases, increased non-assisted suicide. This increase in non-assisted suicide was mostly non-significant when sociodemographic factors were controlled for. Studies from Switzerland and Oregon reported elevated rates of self-initiated death among older women, consistent with higher rates of depressive illnesses in this population. Conclusions: The findings of this review do not support the hypothesis that introducing EAS reduces rates of non-assisted suicide. The disproportionate impact on older women indicates unmet suicide prevention needs in this population.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The evidence from reviews does not support the hypothesis that introducing MAiD reduces rates of (non-assisted) suicide.
“In reality, the evidence from reviews does not support the hypothesis that introducing MAiD reduces rates of (non-assisted) suicide (Doherty et al. 2022; Jones 2022).”
From The realities of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada (2023) · cites this paper as Doherty et al. 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 37
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- [2]Kious BM, Battin M. Physician aid-in-dying and suicide prevention in psychiatry: a moral crisis? Am J Bioeth 2019; 19(10): 29– 39. 31557090
- [3]Reed P. Is “aid in dying” suicide? Theor Med Bioeth 2019; 40(2): 123–39. 30955151
- [4]Gerson SM, Bingley A, Preston N, Grinyer A. When is hastened death considered suicide? A systematically conducted literature review about palliative care professionals’ experiences where assisted dying is legal. BMC Palliat Care 2019; 18: 75. PMC6717643 31472690
- [5]Jones DA. Assisted dying and suicide prevention. J Disabil Relig 2018; 22(3): 298– 316.
- [6]Koopman J, Putter H. Regional variation in the practice of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the Netherlands. Neth J Med 2016; 74(9): 387–94. 27905305
- [13]Rayner L, Price A, Evans A, Valsraj K, Higginson IJ, Hotopf M. Antidepressants for depression in physically ill people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 3: CD007503. PMC12279289 20238354
- [14]Posner RA. Aging and Old Age. University of Chicage Press, 1997.
- [16]Iacobucci G. Assisted dying: Hancock asks for more data on suicides of terminally ill people. BMJ 2021; 373: n1107. 33910921
- [19]Del Carpio L, Paul S, Paterson A, Rasmussen S. A systematic review of controlled studies of suicidal and self-harming behaviours in adolescents following bereavement by suicide. PLoS One 2021; 16(7): e0254203. 34242305 PMC8270178
- [20]Cook DA, Reed DA. Appraising the quality of medical education research methods: the medical education research study quality instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-education. Acad Med 2015; 90(8): 1067–76. 26107881
- [21]Zalman M, Stack S. The relationship between euthanasia and suicide in the Netherlands: a time series analysis, 1950-1990. Soc Sci Q 1996; 77(3): 577–93.
- [22]Jones DA, Paton D. How does legalization of physician-assisted suicide affect rates of suicide? South Med J 2015; 108(10): 599– 604. 26437189
- [23]Steck N, Zwahlen M, Egger M. Time-trends in assisted and unassisted suicides completed with different methods: Swiss national cohort. Swiss Med Wkly 2015; 145: w14153. 26099005
- [24]Steck N, Egger M, Zwahlen M. Assisted and unassisted suicide in men and women: longitudinal study of the Swiss population. Br J Psychiatry 2016; 208(5): 484–90. 26743810
- [25]Nanner H. The effect of assisted dying on suicidality: a synthetic control analysis of population suicide rates in Belgium. J Public Health Policy 2021; 42(1): 86– 97. 32895484
- [26]Canetto SS, McIntosh JL. A comparison of physician-assisted/death-with-dignity-act death and suicide patterns in older adult women and men. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2022; 30(2): 211–20. 34253440
- [28]Jones DA. Euthanasia, assisted suicide, and suicide rates in Europe. J Ethics Ment Health 2022; 11: 1– 35.
- [29]Girma S, Paton D. Is assisted suicide a substitute for unassisted suicide? Eur Econ Rev 2022; 145: 104113.
- [30]Frei A, Schenker T, Finzen A, Dittmann V, Kraeuchi K, Hoffmann-Richter U. The Werther effect and assisted suicide. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2003; 33(2): 192– 200. 12882420
- [31]Callahan J. The ethics of assisted suicide. Health Soc Work 1994; 19(4): 237–44. 7813961
- [32]Neuner T, Hübner-Liebermann B, Hajak G, Hausner H. Assisted suicide on TV--the public ‘license to kill’. Eur J Public Health 2009; 19(4): 359–60. 19380331
- [33]Cheng Q, Li H, Silenzio V, Caine ED. Suicide contagion: a systematic review of definitions and research utility. PLoS One 2014; 9(9): e108724. 25259604 PMC4178222
- [34]Robinson J, Cox G, Bailey E, Hetrick S, Rodrigues M, Fisher S, Social media and suicide prevention: a systematic review. Early Interv Psychiatry 2016; 10(2): 103–21. 25702826
- [36]Niederkrotenthaler T, Kirchner S, Till B, Sinyor M, Tran US, Pirkis J, Systematic review and meta-analyses of suicidal outcomes following fictional portrayals of suicide and suicide attempt in entertainment media. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 36: 100922. 34308310 PMC8257930
- [37]Mishara BL, Dargis L. Systematic comparison of recommendations for safe messaging about suicide in public communications. J Affect Disord 2019; 244: 124–54. 30340101
- [38]Mishara BL, Weisstub DN. The legal status of suicide: a global review. Int J Law Psychiatry 2016; 44: 54– 74. 26375452
- [39]Haste F, Charlton J, Jenkins R. Potential for suicide prevention in primary care? An analysis of factors associated with suicide. Br J Gen Pract 1998; 48(436): 1759–63. 10198484 PMC1313268
- [40]Cheatle MD. Depression, chronic pain, and suicide by overdose: on the edge. Pain Med 2011; 12(suppl 2): S43–S8. 21668756 PMC3125689
- Authors
- Doherty, A. M., Axe, C. J., & Jones, D. A.
- Affiliations
- University College Dublin (IE)
- University of Washington (US)
- St Mary's University Twickenham London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Doherty, Anne M.
- Venue
- BJPsych Open
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2022-06-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e108-e108
- ISSN
- 2056-4724 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9230443
- OpenAlex
- W4281824245
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- BJPsych Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- St Mary's University Repository (ULCC) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- euthanasia, assisted suicide, suicide rates, suicide prevention, older women, depression, life-limiting illness, end-of-life decisions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review