The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Eysenck Personality Inventory Scores of Patients with Depressive Illnesses
Abstract
The Maudsley Personality Inventory (MPI) and its successor the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI) are frequently used to assess the personalities of psychiatric patients, and Eysenck advocates their routine administration as an aid to both diagnosis and treatment. However, a fundamental requirement of any personality test given to patients is that it should be relatively independent of the patient's mental state and reflect his personality rather than his illness. In depressive illnesses at least, it is doubtful whether this requirement is met. Coppen and Metcalfe (1965) administered the MPI to 39 patients with severe depression while they were depressed and again after recovery. Their mean N (neuroticism) score fell from 30.5 to 18.7 on recovery, and their mean E (extraversion) score rose from 17.3 to 20.6. Both changes were statistically significant. Assuming that the true scores were those obtained after recovery, it follows that the mean N score increased 63 per cent. and the E score decreased 19 per cent. during the episode of depression. The customary definition of personality as the relatively stable and enduring aspects of an individual's behaviour precludes such gross changes from being interpreted as changes in personality. One can only conclude, therefore, either that N and E scores obtained in the presence of severe depression are meaningless, or that they are a reflection of something other than the individual's personality. In the case of Coppen and Metcalfe's findings the most obvious explanation is that although patients are enjoined in the test instructions to rate their “usual way of acting or feeling” they do not in practice do so, but remain preoccupied with their current state of mind. Several MPI questions like “Does your mind often wander while you are trying to concentrate?” and “Have you often lost sleep over your worries?” are clearly relevant to the mental state of depression and probably attract positive replies from most patients regardless of their normal feelings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Family caregivers of people with dementia
Brodaty, H., & Donkin, M. (2009) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2009.11.2/hbrodaty · Cited by 1,644
Kendler, K. S., Kuhn, J., & Prescott, C. A. (2004) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.4.631 · Cited by 799
Jylhä, P., & Isometsä, E. (2006) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20167 · Cited by 355
Determinants of burden in those who care for someone with dementia
Campbell, P., Wright, J., Oyebode, J., Job, D., Crome, P., Bentham, P., Jones, L., & Lendon, C. (2008) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.2071 · Cited by 273
Neuroticism, extraversion, life events and depression
Farmer, A., Redman, K., Harris, T., Mahmood, A., Sadler, S., Pickering, A., & McGuffin, P. (2002) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1017/s0007125000161823 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Kendell, R. E., & DiScipio, W. J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 1968-06
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 511
- Pages
- 767-770
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W1978996873
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eysenck Personality Inventory Scores of Patients with Depressive Illnesses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1192/bjp.114.511.767
- The paper
- Kendell, R. E., & DiScipio, W. J. (1968). Eysenck Personality Inventory Scores of Patients with Depressive Illnesses. British Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.114.511.767
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.