The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Comparison of Two Psychiatric Screening Tests
Abstract
Summary: A comparison is made between the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and the Symptom Checklist (SCL) as psychiatric screening tests in community-based research projects. Both are shown to correlate equally well with independent clinical assessment, and the differences between them mainly reside in the form of their response scales. The GHQ works best as a screening test, since it has fewer false positives associated with its use, but it may miss those with long-standing disorders. The SCL tends not to miss long-standing disorders and furnishes diagnostic sub-scales if these are required. Both tests function better with men than with women and with whites than with blacks, but neither is affected by social class or age of the respondent. The study revealed high correlations between the symptoms of anxiety and depression, and indicated some possible differences between the symptom clusters seen in whites and in blacks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diagnosing postpartum depression in mothers and fathers: whatever happened to anxiety?
Matthey, S., Barnett, B., Howie, P., & Kavanagh, D. J. (2003) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00012-5 · Cited by 547
Ciechanowski, P. S., Katon, W. J., Russo, J. E., & Hirsch, I. B. (2003) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0163-8343(03)00055-0 · Cited by 428
Community-Integrated Home-Based Depression Treatment in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ciechanowski, P., Wagner, E., Schmaling, K., Schwartz, S., Williams, B., Diehr, P., Kulzer, J., Gray, S., Collier, C., & LoGerfo, J. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.13.1569 · Cited by 406
Symptoms of Emotional Distress in a Family Planning Service: Stability over a Four-Week Period
Winokur, A., Winokur, D. F., Rickels, K., & Cox, D. S. (1984) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.144.4.395 · Cited by 390
Self-citationPsychological distress as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in the Whitehall II Study
Stansfeld, S. A., Fuhrer, R., Shipley, M. J., & Marmot, M. G. (2002) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/31.1.248 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldberg, D., Rickels, K., Downing, R., & Hesbacher, P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 1976-07
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-67
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2007630073
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Two Psychiatric Screening Tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1192/bjp.129.1.61
- The paper
- Goldberg, D., Rickels, K., Downing, R., & Hesbacher, P. (1976). A Comparison of Two Psychiatric Screening Tests. British Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.129.1.61
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
