The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Controlled Study of the Onset, Duration and Prevalence of Postnatal Depression
Abstract
In a two-stage screening procedure using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Goldberg's Standardised Psychiatric Interview, 232 women six months after delivery were compared with control women individually matched for age, marital status and number of children, obtained from general practitioner lists, who were not pregnant nor had had a baby in the previous 12 months. No significant difference in the point prevalence of depression at six months was found between the postnatal (9.1%) and control women (8.2%) nor in the six-month period prevalence (13.8% postnatal, 13.4% controls), but a threefold higher rate of onset of depression was found within five weeks of childbirth. The possible explanations relate to the long duration of depression in women with young children, and the stressful effect of childbirth and its psychosocial sequelae.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Detection of Postnatal Depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 · Cited by 14,183
Self-citationEpidemiology of Puerperal Psychoses
Kendell, R. E., Chalmers, J. C., & Platz, C. (1987) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.150.5.662 · Cited by 1,119
A Prospective Study of Emotional Disorders in Childbearing Women
Kumar, R., & Robson, K. M. (1984) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.144.1.35 · Cited by 980
Screening for depression during pregnancy with the edinburgh depression scale (EDDS)
Murray, D., & Cox, J. L. (1990) · Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology · doi:10.1080/02646839008403615 · Cited by 973
Self-citationCooper, P. J., Campbell, E. A., Day, A., Kennerley, H., & Bond, A. (1988) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.152.6.799 · Cited by 425
Cited by
Perinatal Depression: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Incidence
Gavin, N. I., Gaynes, B. N., Lohr, K. N., Meltzer-Brody, S., Gartlehner, G., & Swinson, T. (2005) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000183597.31630.db · Cited by 3,282
Rates and risk of postpartum depression – a meta-analysis
O'hara, M. W., & Swain, A. M. (1996) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/09540269609037816 · Cited by 3,116
Antenatal risk factors for postpartum depression: a synthesis of recent literature
Robertson, E., Grace, S., Wallington, T., & Stewart, D. E. (2004) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.02.006 · Cited by 1,886
Postpartum depression: current status and future directions
O'Hara, M. W., & McCabe, J. E. (2013) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185612 · Cited by 1,750
Gaynes, B. N., Gavin, N., Meltzer-Brody, S., Lohr, K. N., Swinson, T., Gartlehner, G., Brody, S., & Miller, W. C. (2005) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e439372005-001 · Cited by 1,211
Metadata
- Authors
- Cox, J. L., Murray, D., & Chapman, G.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-31
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2088945700
- Cited by
- 765
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 20.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
