Determinants of general practitioner recognition of psychological problems in a multi-ethnic inner-city health district
Abstract
Background: With few exceptions, evaluation of the capacity of general practitioners (GPs) to recognise psychiatric disorder in their patients has failed to consider the role of ethnic diversity in the consultation process and whether such knowledge can improve understanding of the degree to which psychiatric morbidity is recognised within GP settings. Methods: This research was completed in five general practices representative of all those within an inner-city health district. Psychiatric morbidity in patients consecutively attending the practices was then assessed using the General Health Questionnaire; in addition, GPs were asked to complete a checklist of current problems identified during each consultation. Results: Analysis suggested that Asian and Black patients were less likely than White patients to have psychological problems identified; that social problems and a psychiatric history facilitated recognition; and that current physical illness hindered recognition. Conclusions: GP recognition of psychological problems varies according to patient ethnicity but can be substantially masked by both the physical and social circumstances of patients at consultation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Even when people from ethnic minority groups attend their GP, detection rates for mental health problems are lower.
“Even when people do attend their GP, detection rates for mental health problems are lower in ethnic minority groups.41,42”
From Can a self-referral system help improve access to psychological treatments? (2010) · cites this paper as [42]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Odell, S. M., Surtees, P. G., Wainwright, N. W. J., Commander, M. J., & Sashidharan, S. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- MRC Biostatistics Unit (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Odell, S. M.
- ORCID
- Sashidharan, S. P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 537-541
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W1969396105
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- general practitioners, psychiatric morbidity, ethnic differences, Asian patients, Black patients, physical illness, social problems, psychiatric history, consultation process, General Health Questionnaire
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Asia, Mental Disorders, England, Ethnicity, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Urban Health Services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review