Mental disorder and violence: A special (high security) hospital study
Abstract
Background From a first clinical description of a complete resident sample of special (high security) hospital patients, we examined the association between mental disorder and violence. Method A record survey of all 1740 patients resident at any time between 1 January and 30 June 1993, inclusive, and, for most, the official criminal record. Results 1015 patients (58%) had functional psychosis, one-quarter of whom also had an independent personality disorder; 461 (26%) had personality disorders uncomplicated by psychosis, and 264 (16%) had learning disabilities. Pre-admission substance misuse, which was probably under-recorded, had been most common among those with psychosis and an independent personality disorder. Less than 10% had never been convicted of a criminal offence, although 25% had been admitted directly from other hospitals. Direct personal violence was more common among men, and fire-setting among women. Schizophrenia was most strongly associated with personal violence. More than 75% of those with a psychosis were recorded as being driven to offend by their delusions. In the absence of delusions, hallucinations had no such effect. Conclusions For people with personality disorder better clinical descriptions seem essential. For people with a pure psychosis, as symptoms were usually a factor driving the index offence, treatment appears as important for public safety as for personal health.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These figures are similar to the 10% reported by Taylor et al and Duggan et al for high security and medium security hospitals in the UK.
“These figures are similar to the 10% reported by Taylor et al (Taylor 1998) and Duggan et al (Duggan 2013) for high security and medium security hospitals in the UK.”
From Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (2015) · cites this paper as Taylor 1998
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending
Khan, O., Ferriter, M., Huband, N., Powney, M. J., Dennis, J. A., & Duggan, C. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007989.pub2 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
- Authors
- Taylor, P. J., Leese, M., Williams, D., Butwell, M., Daly, R., & Larkin, E.
- Affiliations
- Broadmoor Hospital (GB)
- Guy's Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, Pamela J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 172
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 218-226
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2165000205
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 20.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- psychosis, schizophrenia, personality disorders, learning disabilities, substance abuse, offending, delusions, hallucinations, fire-setting, public safety, forensic psychiatry
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, England, Female, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Social Behavior Disorders, Violence, Cohort Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review