The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ethnic variations in pathways to and use of specialist mental health services in the UK: Systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Background: Inequalities of service use across ethnic groups are important to policy makers, service providers and service users. Aims: To identify ethnic variations in pathways to specialist mental health care, continuity of contact, voluntary and compulsory psychiatric in-patient admissions; to assess the methodological strength of the findings. Method: A systematic review of all quantitative studies comparing use of mental health services by more than one ethnic group in the UK. Narrative analysis supplemented by meta-analysis, where appropriate. Results: Most studies compared Black and White patients, finding higher rates of in-patient admission among Black patients. The pooled odds ratio for compulsory admission, Black patients compared with White patients, was 4.31 (95% CI 3.33–5.58). Black patients had more complex pathways to specialist care, with some evidence of ethnic variations in primary care assessments. Conclusions: There is strong evidence of variation between ethnic groups for voluntary and compulsory admissions, and some evidence of variation in pathways to specialist care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schizophrenia and migration: A meta-analysis and review
Cantor-Graae, E., & Selten, J.-P. (2005) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.1.12 · Cited by 1,237
Potential barriers to the use of health services among ethnic minorities: A review
Scheppers, E. (2006) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi113 · Cited by 759
Sleep, Cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bubu, O. M., Brannick, M., Mortimer, J., Umasabor-Bubu, O., Sebastião, Y. V., Wen, Y., Schwartz, S., Borenstein, A. R., Wu, Y., Morgan, D., et al. (2017) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsw032 · Cited by 673
Cultural competence in mental health care: a review of model evaluations
Bhui, K., Warfa, N., Edonya, P., McKenzie, K., & Bhugra, D. (2007) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-7-15 · Cited by 458
Self-citationMemon, A., Taylor, K., Mohebati, L. M., Sundin, J., Cooper, M., Scanlon, T., & de Visser, R. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012337 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhui, K., Stansfeld, S., Hull, S., Priebe, S., Mole, F., & Feder, G.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-116
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2211781245
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethnic variations in pathways to and use of specialist mental health services in the UK: Systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1192/bjp.182.2.105
- The paper
- Bhui, K., Stansfeld, S., Hull, S., Priebe, S., Mole, F., & Feder, G. (2003). Ethnic variations in pathways to and use of specialist mental health services in the UK: Systematic review. British Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.182.2.105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.